Representation Theory: Proving Invariant Subspaces and Decomposition Properties

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem with describing and proving properties of subspaces preserved by a given operator in a representation of a group. The conversation mentions the definitions of \varphi-invariant, irreducible, and decomposable representations, and provides answers to parts (a) and (b) of the problem. The conversation also discusses potential solutions for parts (c) and (d) of the problem, but requests help in proving them.
  • #1
Ted123
446
0

Homework Statement



2a9uzkn.jpg


I think I've done (a) and (b) correctly (please check).

I'm stuck as to how to describe all subspaces of [itex]V[/itex] that are preserved by the operators [itex]\varphi(t)[/itex] and how to prove that [itex]\varphi[/itex] can't be decomposed into a direct sum [itex]\varphi = \varphi |_U \oplus \varphi |_{U'}[/itex] where [itex]U,U'\neq \{0\},V[/itex] are 2 [itex]\varphi[/itex]-invariant subpaces of [itex]V\neq U\oplus U'[/itex].

2. Relevant definitions

Let [itex](\varphi , V)[/itex] be a representation of a group [itex]G[/itex] and [itex]U \subset V[/itex] be a vector subspace of [itex]V[/itex]. Then [itex]U[/itex] is called [itex]\varphi[/itex]-invariant if for all [itex]u\in U, g\in G[/itex] we have [itex]\varphi(g)(u) \in U[/itex].

[itex](\varphi , V)[/itex] is called irreducible if the only [itex]\varphi[/itex]-invariant subspaces of [itex]V[/itex] are the trivial ones: [itex]\{0\}[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex].

[itex](\varphi , V)[/itex] is called decomposable if [itex]V=U\oplus U'[/itex] where [itex]U, U'[/itex] are [itex]\varphi[/itex]-invariant subspaces of [itex]V[/itex] such that [itex]U,U' \neq \{0\}, V[/itex]. Then [itex]\varphi = \varphi |_U \oplus \varphi |_{U'}[/itex] where [itex]\varphi |_U[/itex] is the restriction of [itex]\varphi[/itex] to the subspace [itex]U[/itex] etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



My answers for (a) and (b)

(a) [itex](\varphi , V)[/itex] is a representation of the group [itex](\mathbb{R},+)[/itex], for:

[itex]\varphi(s+t)(P) = P(x+s+t)[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = p_0 (x+s+t)^2 + p_1(x+s+t) + p_2[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = \varphi(t) ( p_0 (x+s)^2 + p_1(x+s)+p_2)[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = \varphi(t)(P(x+s))[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = \varphi(t)(\varphi(s)(P))[/itex]

so that [itex]\varphi[/itex] is a homomorphism, hence a representation.

(b) The subspace [itex]U\subset V[/itex] consisting of all complex-valued polynomials [itex]Q(x) = q_0x+q_1[/itex] of degree at most 1 is a [itex]\varphi[/itex]-invariant subspace, for:

[itex]\varphi(t)(Q) = \varphi(t)(q_0x+q_1)[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = q_0(x+t) + q_1[/itex]
[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; = q_0x + (q_0t+q_1) \in U[/itex]
Moreover, [itex]U\neq \{0\}, V[/itex] so that [itex]\varphi[/itex] is not irreducible.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For (c), I think all subspaces of V that are preserved by the operator \varphi(t) are all vector subspaces U \subset V such that for all u\in U, t\in \mathbb{R} we have \varphi(t)(u)\in U. However, I'm not sure how to prove this.For (d), I'm not sure how to prove that \varphi can't be decomposed into a direct sum \varphi = \varphi |_U \oplus \varphi |_{U'} where U,U'\neq \{0\},V are 2 \varphi-invariant subpaces of V\neq U\oplus U'. Any help would be much appreciated!
 

Related to Representation Theory: Proving Invariant Subspaces and Decomposition Properties

What is representation theory?

Representation theory is a branch of mathematics that studies how abstract algebraic structures, such as groups, rings, and algebras, can be represented by linear transformations of vector spaces. It provides a powerful tool for understanding the structure of these abstract objects and their relationships.

What are the applications of representation theory?

Representation theory has many applications in mathematics and physics. It is used to study symmetry and group actions in geometric objects, to classify and analyze algebraic structures, and to understand the behavior of physical systems described by quantum mechanics.

What are the types of representations in representation theory?

There are two main types of representations in representation theory: finite-dimensional representations and infinite-dimensional representations. Finite-dimensional representations are those where the vector space is finite-dimensional, while infinite-dimensional representations involve infinite-dimensional vector spaces.

What is the importance of irreducible representations in representation theory?

Irreducible representations are those that cannot be broken down into smaller representations. They play a crucial role in representation theory as they provide the building blocks for constructing more complex representations. They also have important applications in physics, particularly in the study of quantum mechanics.

How is representation theory related to other areas of mathematics?

Representation theory has connections to many other areas of mathematics, including algebraic geometry, combinatorics, and topology. It also has applications in diverse fields such as computer science, chemistry, and biology. Additionally, representation theory has connections to other branches of mathematics, such as number theory and differential equations, through its application in physics.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
853
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
864
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top