Residue Calculus: Evaluating Poles and Contours

  • Thread starter Thread starter eeuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Residue
eeuler
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


25f36ae.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


So there are poles at: z=\pm2 and at z= -1 of order 4. Right?

My query is, when evaluating these poles (using the residue theorem), is it right that for (i) Z = 1/2, no residues lie in that contour?
for (iii), do all residues lie in the contour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right about the poles, but for the rest, are you just guessing? Why don't you draw a graph? No, I don't think the triangle in iii) includes all poles.
 
^^I wasn't sure how to determine whether a pole is inside a specified contour but my tutor suggested drawing a graph, which i have been doing, in which case shouldn't (i) have no poles in the contour? As for (iii) then, would Z=+2, and Z=-1 lie in the contour?
 
Your tutor is wise. Yes, i) contains no poles and iii) contains z=(-1) and z=2.
 
^^Thanks :)
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top