Resistance of the ground problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average resistance of the ground when a pile driver strikes a pile. Initial calculations include determining potential and kinetic energy, as well as the speed of the hammer upon impact. Participants suggest using energy conservation and momentum principles to find the resistance, emphasizing the importance of correctly calculating the velocity after impact and the deceleration as the pile sinks into the ground. There is some disagreement on the method for calculating ground resistance, with one participant suggesting to omit the gravitational force term from the final calculation. The final consensus points towards a ground resistance estimate around 39,076 N, derived from the correct application of the equations discussed.
MNWO
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, so I've been given a physics question which is black magic to me, so I thought i will ask you for help :) Here is the question:
A pile driver hammer of mass 170kg falls freely through a distance of 6m to strike a pile of mass 410kg and drives it 75mm into the ground. The hammer does not rebound when driving the pile. Determine the average resistance of the ground.

This is what i have done so far:
m1=170kg
m2=410kg
D1=6m
D2=75mm
PE= m x g x h
PE= 170 x 9.81 x 6
PE=10006.2J
Velocity=2 x g x s
(2) x (9.81) x (6-0)=117.72 square root=10.84 m/s
KE= ½ x mass x velocity
KE=1/2 x 170 x 10.84*
KE=9987.97J

Work= change in kinetic energy + change in potential energy + work due to friction
½ ( 170kg) ( 10.84*-0) + (150kg)(9.81m/s*) (6-0)
=18816.97N without work due to friction

Now I don't know how to work out: work due to friction and how to calculate the resistance of the ground. This is what I was able to do myself and now I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to PF.
If you read the rules at the top of the General Physics Forum (but who does??) you would see that this question should be in the appropriate Forum. I see you have made a start by writing out as much as possible. I suggest you have written down more than you need and it has overwhelmed you. You started off on the right lines.

You can do all this, using Energy and Momentum considerations. 1.Speed of hammer on impact (easy). 2. Momentum is conserved so you can find the speed (then total KE) of the pair after the (instantaneous impact* of hammer on pile). Then Energy conservation says that this KE plus the gpe of the two above the final depth reached is the Work done (Force times distance). You know the distance so you can find the force.
*They will travel together through the ground after that.
 
I done it like this, can you tell me if the answer is right?
Mass of the hammer(mh) x velocity*=mass of the hammer+mass of the pile (mp) v2*
170x10.84=(170+410) v2
1842.8=580 x v2
V2=1842.8/580
(the velocity of the hammer and the pile together)V2=3.17 m/s
A= V*-U*/2s
A= 3.17*-0*/2x0.075
A=66.99 m/s
GR= (m1+m2)(g)+(m1+m2)(a)
GR=(170+410) x(9.81) + (170+ 410) x (66.99)
5689.8+ 38854.2
=44544N is the total amount of ground resistance
 
"KE= ½ x mass x velocity"
You are missing an exponent here.

"Velocity=2 x g x s"
What is "s" here? It must be the falling time. But you don't know the falling time without calculating it. Better try another approach.

"(2) x (9.81) x (6-0)=117.72 square root=10.84 m/s"
This is gibberish to me. Where did the square root come from?
 
MNWO said:
I done it like this, can you tell me if the answer is right?
Mass of the hammer(mh) x velocity*=mass of the hammer+mass of the pile (mp) v2*
170x10.84=(170+410) v2
1842.8=580 x v2
V2=1842.8/580
(the velocity of the hammer and the pile together)V2=3.17 m/s
A= V*-U*/2s
A= 3.17*-0*/2x0.075
A=66.99 m/s
GR= (m1+m2)(g)+(m1+m2)(a)
GR=(170+410) x(9.81) + (170+ 410) x (66.99)
5689.8+ 38854.2
=44544N is the total amount of ground resistance
Let's see. Your calculation for the hammer + mass velocity after the strike is correct, IMHO. I get almost the same result:
v3 = (170 * 10,85)/(170 + 410) = 3,18 m/s

And, concerning the negative acceleration A when sinking in the ground, you get 66,99 and I have got 67,41 m/s2, that is quite close. The equation that I used here is v2 = 2 * a * 0,075. Solving for a, I get a = 3,182/2*0,075 = 67,41 m/s2

But I don't agree with the way you calculate the ground resistance. You should delete the first term of your sum GR=(170+410) x(9.81) + (170+410) x (66.99), With the second term only, you get a result (38854 N) that is close to the one I've got by other, less simple way, and that I believe correct (39076 N)
 
  • Like
Likes MNWO
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top