Rest frame angular distribution of meson decay into two photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decay of a pion into two photons in its rest frame, where the photons emerge back-to-back with equal probability in any direction. The probability distribution function, f(θ), is initially considered constant due to the isotropic nature of the decay. However, the problem requires determining f(θ) in the lab frame, where the pion is moving, leading to a distribution of f(θ) = sin(θ). This arises from the uniform probability across a spherical surface surrounding the pion, reflecting the geometry of spherical coordinates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the conservation of momentum and the implications of boosting to the lab frame.
slimjim
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



consider a pion decaying into 2 photons.
In the rest frame of the pion, the two photons must emerge back-to-back photons are equally likely to emerge in any direction.

determine the rest frame angular distribution of the emerging photons.


Homework Equations



ΔP=f(θ)Δθ is the probability that a photon emerges with polar
angle θ within some infinitesimal interval Δθ in the angle,

and f(θ) is the rest frame angular distribution.

The Attempt at a Solution



in the pion frame, the photons emerge back to back, and since there is no preferred decay direction, the probabilities of a photon emerging in any direction are the same.

so f(theta) is a constant?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem is asking you to calculate ##f(\theta)## for the lab frame. The pion is moving in this frame. If you were only looking at the decay in the the pion's rest frame, then yes, ##f(\theta)## would be a constant because the decay is isotropic.
 
where did you find this problem.
 
I paraphrased it from a homework problem. The actual homework question asks to explain why f(θ)=sinθ is the rest frame angular distribution. Which is even less reassuring...

but the question doesn't specify the direction in which the pion is traveling in the lab frame, and θ is the usual polar angle, relative to some choice of z-axis.
 
Last edited:
Say theta is taken from the direction of the pions momentum in the lab frame (call it +z). Then the pion decays into two photons, that when boosted to the lab frame, give the same total momentum as the pion initially.

So if the photons emerge along the z axis, could boosting to the lab frame violate cons. of momentum? I don't see how but this might give rise to the sin(theta) distribution.
 
Think about this: equal probability of emerging in any direction means the probability distribution is uniform over a two-dimensional sphere. You could write this as ΔP=f(θ,φ)ΔθΔφ. What would f(θ,φ) be in that case? Remember to think the properties of spherical coordinates.
 
diazona said:
Think about this: equal probability of emerging in any direction means the probability distribution is uniform over a two-dimensional sphere. You could write this as ΔP=f(θ,φ)ΔθΔφ. What would f(θ,φ) be in that case? Remember to think the properties of spherical coordinates.

oh i see. picturing a sperical surface surrounding the pion (in its own frame), the probability of a photon emerging through some infinitesimally small surface element would be constant.

for a sphere, dA=sin(theta)d∅dθ; ΔP=sin(theta)ΔθΔ∅

phi and theta are orthogonal, so ignoring phi, ΔP=sin(theta)Δθ
 
Back
Top