Retarded Potential of Moving Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the retarded potential \phi_{ret} for a charge moving at a constant velocity along the x-axis. The initial approach involves using the Dirac delta function to simplify the integral for potential, but the user encounters confusion regarding the correct application of derivatives and substitutions. After some back-and-forth, the user realizes the need to adjust the delta function to reflect the correct velocity and acknowledges a mistake in taking the derivative with respect to x instead of t. Ultimately, the user concludes that dividing by the velocity resolves the issue with the pesky -v term. The thread highlights the complexities of applying mathematical concepts in electromagnetism, particularly in relation to moving charges.
Shinobii
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate \phi_{ret} for a charge moving with constant v, along the x-axis.

2. The attempt at a solution

$$
\phi = q \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\delta(x' - vt')}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}'|} dx'.
$$

I then use the Dirac delta relation,

$$
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta[f(x)]g(x) = \frac{g(x_o)}{|f'(x_o)|}.
$$

Where x_o is the solution of f(x_o) = 0.

I am not really sure how to do this, except that

$$
\begin{eqnarray}
f(x) &=& x' - vt', \\
g(x) &=& \frac{1}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}'|}.
\end{eqnarray}
$$

Which results in (I think),

$$
\frac{1}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|}\frac{-1}{\frac{d(vt')}{dt}}.
$$

Then I suppose I would substitute t' = t - |\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|/c. Looking at the derivative in the denominator I would get,

$$
v \bigg( 1 - \frac{1}{c}\frac{d}{dt}|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o| \bigg).
$$

But here is where I get stuck (assuming I have not already made any mistakes).

Ok I was able to reach the final result for the derivative;

$$
-v \bigg( 1 - \frac{v}{c} \frac{(\vec{x} - \vec{x}_o)}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|} \bigg)
$$

however, I have a pesky -v term multiple to the result! Should I have written the delta as \delta(x' - v't') instead of \delta(x' - vt')?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I think I figured it out. We are looking at the case where f(x_o) = 0, so we just divide by v.
 
If anyone is keeping track, it turns out I should have been taking the derivative w.r.t x. . . f'(x_o) = \frac{d}{dx}f(x_o). Woops!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top