RGB Tristimulus Graph: Negative Red Values Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyb3rGlitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
Negative red values in the RGB tristimulus graph indicate colors that cannot be accurately represented within the RGB color space, as they fall outside the gamut defined by the primary colors. The graph's convex edge represents 'pure' wavelengths, while the area inside the triangle shows achievable colors. Not all colors exist within this triangle, leading to the occurrence of negative values. Additionally, the chart's accuracy is limited, and typical computer monitors display an even narrower range of colors. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the limitations of color representation in computer graphics.
Cyb3rGlitch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm just trying to get my head around the RGB tristimulus graph, as follows:

[URL]http://cnx.org/content/m18092/latest/trist.png[/URL]

Why are there negative values for red? What does it mean?

I'd appreciate it if someone could help. And no, this isn't a homework question, it's part of my Computer Graphics course notes, and I'm having trouble understanding this particular concept.

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Refer to a http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/images/gamut/ciechart.jpg" .
'Pure' wavelengths are the convex edge of the diagram. So the tristimulus values (435.8nm, 546nm, 700nm) are three points on this edge, and the colors they can represent are the points inside that triangle. Not every color is inside it, which is why you can have negative values.

Note that the chart itself isn't really accurate for this reason. And your computer monitor only displays an even smaller gamut (see e.g. http://jkphoto.net/attach/1/1292499025.jpg" image showing some common color spaces)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top