A Ricci tensor for Fermi normal coordinates

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter TimWilliams87
  • Start date Start date
TimWilliams87
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can the Ricci tensor be written simply in terms of second derivatives of the metric by the relation with the Riemann tensor?
I am learning about Fermi normal coordinates for an inertial observer on a reference curve from the textbook ''Advanced general relativity'' by Eric Poisson. The metric is written as g = eta + h, where eta is the Minkowski metric and h is the spacetime curvature perturbation close to the geodesic up to order x^2. t is proper time along the geodesic.

In these coordinates, the metric can be expressed as

$$ g_{tt} = -1 -R_{tatb}(t)x^ax^b + O(x^3), $$

$$ g_{ta} = \frac{2}{3}R_{tbac}(t) + O(x^3), $$

$$ g_{ab} = \delta_{ab} - \frac{1}{3}R_{acbd}(t)x^cx^d + O(x^3), $$

where ##R_{abcd}## is the Riemann tensor. It is stated in Poisson that these are related to statements regarding second derivatives of the metric (which I assume are just spatial derivatives only of the perturbing part of the metric h).

Since the components of the Riemann tensor can be written in terms of second derivatives of the metric, can one write components of the Ricci tensor simply in terms of second derivatives of the metric? So, for example, what is the component of the Ricci tensor R_{00}?

We do have as usual the relation

$$ R_{00} = g^{ii}R_{0i0i} , $$

but this seems like it would become complicated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
@TimWilliams87 please review the PF LaTeX Guide. LaTeX formulas here are delimited by double dollar signs, for equations standing alone, or double pound signs for inline LaTeX. I have used magic moderator powers to edit your OP accordingly.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top