RMS speeds of helium and argon atoms

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) speeds of helium and argon at 1000 degrees Celsius, the formula v_{rms} = √(3kT/m) should be used, where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and m is the molecular mass in kilograms. The temperature must be converted from Celsius to Kelvin for accurate calculations. The molecular masses of helium and argon need to be obtained in atomic mass units and converted to kilograms for the formula. Online resources can provide additional information and help clarify concepts related to molecular speeds and RMS calculations. Utilizing search engines can aid in finding relevant physics material and formulas.
twiztdlogik
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i am having a bit of trouble with this question, and its not explained very clearly in our textbook...

"what are the RMS speeds of helium an dargon in a gas at 1000 degrees C"

any help would be greatly appreciated. physics is definitely not one of my strengths...

=D

cheers.
KC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will want to use the formula for the root-mean-square speed of molecules in an ideal gas

v_{rms} = \surd \frac{3kT}{m}

where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature in Kelvins (so you will have to convert the 1000º C.), and m is the molecular mass in kg. (you will need the mass of a helium or argon atom in atomic mass units and the value for 1 amu in kilograms).
 
oh thanks a bunch! ur a genius

:biggrin:
 
twiztdlogik said:
oh thanks a bunch! ur a genius

I am going to reply that you can be as big a "genius" as I was to answer this. As they like to say around various forums, Google is your friend. I searched on "molecular speeds" and "RMS" to make sure I gave you the right formula; there are three averages given for speeds in velocity distributions of molecules in an ideal gas, all with similar expressions and differing only in the numerical constant... (The 'Net is an excellent reference source for physics material, if you don't mind having to pick through search results.)
 
  • Like
Likes Habib Idrees
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top