Robot Climbs Rope Without Batteries: Project Idea

  • Thread starter Thread starter carzygoul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Robot Rope
AI Thread Summary
The project involves creating a rope-climbing robot that operates without chemical power sources, specifically avoiding batteries. The robot must ascend an 8mm thick rope to a height of approximately 1.5 meters. Suggestions include using two connected rollers with rubber bands or exploring the use of a pullback or wind-up motor for improved climbing efficiency. Weight considerations are crucial, as lighter components like rubber bands may enhance performance. The discussion emphasizes the need for innovative, non-chemical power solutions in robotic design.
carzygoul
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys I have a freaking project that requires me to build a rope climbing robot that cannot be powered by chemical based. Basically no batteries as such are required.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some background info about the scale and expected complexity of the project will be good to have. Right now I have no clue if you mean just a spring-loaded toy that'll pull on 10 cm of sewing thread, or something like the space elevator climber challenge.
http://www.spaceward.org/elevator2010-pb
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We're basically required to build a robot that is non-chemically powered to climb a rope of 8mm thick to a height of approximately 1.5m
 
carzygoul said:
we're basically required to build a robot that is non-chemically powered to climb a rope of 8mm thick to a height of approximately 1.5m
Simplest thing that comes to mind: Two connected rollers with rubber bands inside, which you wind up.
PHP:
 |
 |
o|o
 |
 |
 
Last edited:
hmm what if i use a pullback or wind-up motor... u think can climb better?
 
Last edited:
carzygoul said:
hmm what if i use a pullback or wind-up motor... u think can climb better?
If you have one, you can try. But keep in mind that the weight counts. Rubber bands are light.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top