Rolling Motion on Rough Surfaces

AI Thread Summary
Friction is essential for initiating rolling motion on rough surfaces, but once an object is rolling without slipping on a horizontal surface, it does not require static friction to maintain that motion. The concept of "cold locking" between the surface's features and the object's surface allows for rolling without slipping. In an ideal scenario, if the object's rotation matches its forward speed, the point of contact has zero velocity, eliminating relative motion and thus friction. However, real-world factors like deformation and rolling friction will eventually slow the object down. Therefore, while friction is crucial for starting rolling, it is not necessary to sustain it on a horizontal surface.
paragchitnis
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Friction is necessary to make motion rolling but if the body is already in rolling motion on rough surface without slipping then, is friction necessary to continue the rolling motion ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paragchitnis said:
Friction is necessary to make motion rolling but if the body is already in rolling motion on rough surface without slipping then, is friction necessary to continue the rolling motion ?
No, not if the surface is horizontal. Once an object is rolling along a horizontal surface, no static friction is required to maintain that rolling motion. (Of course, in 'real life' deformation and rolling friction will slow the object down.)
 
I am confused on the same thing.
Friction force occurs due to cold locking between the crests and troughs of rough surface and the surface of the body. So without such locking, how could it roll?
 
a.ratnaparkhi said:
Friction force occurs due to cold locking between the crests and troughs of rough surface and the surface of the body. So without such locking, how could it roll?
In an abstract, imaginary situation, the object would just happen to be rotating at a rate where it's circumference surface speed is the same as the speed that the object is moving forwards.
 
Once the body starts rolling then velocity at point of contact become zero. Hence there is no relative motion between body and surface at that point and hence no friction.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Back
Top