Rolling Object on Curved Surface: Lagrangian Mechanics + Constraint

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the trajectory of a ball rolling without slip on a curved surface using Lagrangian mechanics. The individual has derived the ball's acceleration along the path but notes it does not depend on the starting height, which was unexpected. They suspect an incorrect assumption regarding the linear decrease of height with arc length. Further analysis suggests that the potential energy term may be a complex function of arc length rather than a simple linear relationship. The conversation invites input on resolving these assumptions and refining the calculations.
physicsnewblol
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to be able to plot a trajectory wrt time of a ball that rolls without slip on a curved surface.

Known variables:
-radius/mass/moment of inertia of the ball.
-formula for the curvature of the path (quadratic)
-formula relating path length and corresponding height above the ground. (linearly decreasing, i.e. as you travel down the curve, you decrease in height).

Homework Equations


Euler-Lagrange Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached for further details.

I've come up with an answer for the acceleration of the ball along the path length. However, it isn't a function of the starting height as I expected. I suspect I may have made an assumption that I'm not supposed to but I can't see what it is.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


After some though and comparison to classical mechanics, I've determined that the assumption that the height of the ball decreases linearly with arc length is not correct.

It seems my potential term is going to be some complicated function of arc length.

Anyone else have thoughts?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top