Rolls-Royce Trent-1000 Engine Issues - British Air cancels flights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
British Airways has canceled hundreds of flights due to excessive wear and tear on Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines powering its Boeing 787 Dreamliner fleet, resulting in five grounded aircraft. Rolls-Royce is struggling to provide sufficient replacement engines and parts, impacting the entire aerospace industry. The overuse of Boeing 777s as substitutes has also led to maintenance issues for those planes. A Rolls-Royce spokesperson acknowledged the supply chain constraints affecting engine availability. The situation reflects broader challenges within the aerospace sector, as seen with similar issues reported by other airlines.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,372
Reaction score
7,223

British Airways cancels hundreds of flights because of Rolls-Royce engine issues​

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...ets-latest-news-uk-gdp-economy-reeves-budget/

BA said it was forced into the measures because of excessive wear and tear to the Trent 1000 engines that power its fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliner jets.

Rolls-Royce has been unable to supply enough replacement engines and parts to keep all of the 787s flying, leading five to be grounded. This equates to 15pc of the fleet.

Boeing 777s, which had been standing in for the stricken planes, have also been overworked to such an extent that they too require visits to the workshop.

Excessive wear & tear?! Design, manufacturing, maintenance or service issue?

A Rolls-Royce spokesman said: “We continue to work with British Airways and all of our customers to minimise the impact of the limited availability of spares due to the current supply chain constraints. Unfortunately, this is an issue affecting the whole aerospace industry.”

Earlier this year, a Rolls-Royce XWB-97 engine used in a Cathy Pacific A350-1000 jet first recorded an engine issue.
https://www.euronews.com/business/2...forces-cathay-pacific-to-ground-some-aircraft

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...cx383-airbus-a350-rolls-royce-xwb-97.1065527/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was across the pond when BA cancelled my return trip. They were not at all helpful on booking the return flight and they still owe me $80.
 
  • Sad
Likes Greg Bernhardt
@Frabjous, send them a link and/or a copy to your post, . (Bad press often gets enough attention to get companies off their behinds.)
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...

Similar threads

Back
Top