Rotation of a Ridgid Body (two masses suspended from a pulley)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a rope over a pulley, with specific parameters provided. The main challenge is calculating the time it takes for the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor, given the mass of the pulley and the torque due to friction. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect acceleration of -2.14 m/s², prompting a review of the equations used, particularly the treatment of the radius and the torque equation. A key error identified was not properly multiplying through by 2 in the torque equation, which affected the results. The conversation highlights the importance of careful attention to detail in solving physics problems involving rotational dynamics.
Gotejjeken
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The two blocks in the figure are connected by a massless rope that passes over a pulley. The pulley is 12 cm in diameter and has a mass of 2.0 kg. As the pulley turns, friction at the axle exerts a torque of magnitude 0.55 N * m.

12.P70.jpg


If the blocks are released from rest, how long does it take the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor?

Homework Equations



Taking mass 1 (m1) to be on the left, and mass 2 (m2) to be on the right:

m1 = 4.0 kg
m2 = 2.0 kg
r = 0.06 m
Mp = 2.0 kg
f = 0.55 N * m

a(m2) = -a(m1)
T1 = m1 * a(m1) + m1 * g (T1 = Tension on mass 1)
T2 = m2 * g - m2 * a(m1) (T2 = Tension on mass 2)

Net Torque = T1 * r - T2 * r - f
alpha = Net Torque / I
I = 1/2 * Mp * r^2 (where Mp = Mass of Pulley)

a(m1) = -alpha * r (negative acceleration and positive rotation)

y = 1/2 * a * (delta)t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equations I get:

Code:
 alpha =  2*r(T1 - T2) - f 
         ------------------
              Mp * r^2

Substituting that alpha into the a(m1) = -alpha * r equation and then solving for a(m1), I get a(m1) = -2.14 m/s^2. Then substituting this value for acceleration into the above kinematic equation and solving for time, I get the time to be 0.97s, which is wrong.

I'm not sure if my issue is just an issue of messing up the signs, or if I am approaching the problem wrong. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Gotejjeken,

Gotejjeken said:

Homework Statement



The two blocks in the figure are connected by a massless rope that passes over a pulley. The pulley is 12 cm in diameter and has a mass of 2.0 kg. As the pulley turns, friction at the axle exerts a torque of magnitude 0.55 N * m.

12.P70.jpg


If the blocks are released from rest, how long does it take the 4.0 kg block to reach the floor?

Homework Equations



Taking mass 1 (m1) to be on the left, and mass 2 (m2) to be on the right:

m1 = 4.0 kg
m2 = 2.0 kg
r = 0.06 m
Mp = 2.0 kg
f = 0.55 N * m

a(m2) = -a(m1)
T1 = m1 * a(m1) + m1 * g (T1 = Tension on mass 1)
T2 = m2 * g - m2 * a(m1) (T2 = Tension on mass 2)

Net Torque = T1 * r - T2 * r - f
alpha = Net Torque / I
I = 1/2 * Mp * r^2 (where Mp = Mass of Pulley)

a(m1) = -alpha * r (negative acceleration and positive rotation)

y = 1/2 * a * (delta)t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equations I get:

Code:
 alpha =  2*r(T1 - T2) - f 
         ------------------
              Mp * r^2

This might just be a typo, but here the 2 should multiply the entire numerator, not just the r(T1-T2) part.
Substituting that alpha into the a(m1) = -alpha * r equation and then solving for a(m1), I get a(m1) = -2.14 m/s^2.

It's difficult to tell (since you haven't show what numbers you used) but I believe in your calculation you are using 12cm as the radius, instead of 6cm. Is that what went wrong?

Then substituting this value for acceleration into the above kinematic equation and solving for time, I get the time to be 0.97s, which is wrong.

I'm not sure if my issue is just an issue of messing up the signs, or if I am approaching the problem wrong. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Oh man, not multiplying all the way through with the 2 was the problem. Thanks, I'm not sure I would have caught that and would most likely be pulling my hair out right now...sometimes it just takes an extra set of eyes =).
 
I am doing a very similar problem right now, and I don't understand how you were able to determine what T1 or T2 were equal to.
 
It's been a while, but looking at my old notes I had (these are free body diagram equations):

Mass1:

(Fnet)y: T1 - m1*g = m1*a(m1)y

Mass2:

(Fnet)y: T2- m2*g = m2*a(m2)y

Then just solved those for T1 and T2 respectively. After that it looks like an application of the torque equations and then putting everything together to get that final equation above and getting acceleration / falling time from there.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top