Rotational Dynamics involving a pulley, spring, and block

AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 9.00 kg on a 51.0° incline is connected to a spring via a rope over a pulley. The problem involves calculating the block's acceleration after it has slid 0.425 m down the incline, considering the effects of kinetic friction and the spring's force. The initial attempt at solving the problem incorrectly used the potential energy formula instead of the spring force. The correct approach involves using separate equations for the block's motion and the pulley’s rotation, leading to the discovery of an acceleration of 3.00 m/s². The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles to rotational dynamics.
JennV
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m = 9.00 kg is situated on an incline of angle θ = 51.0^{\circ} with coefficient of kinetic friction \mu_k = 0.200, and is connected to a light spring of spring constant k = 40.0 N/m via a light rope passing over a massive pulley as shown. The block is released from rest when the spring is unstretched. The uniform solid cylindrical pulley is mounted on a frictionless axle and has the same mass as the block and a radius R = 0.550 m. The light rope which connects the spring to the block slides over the pulley without slipping.

Find the acceleration of the block at the instant it has slid a distance of x = 0.425 m parallel to the incline. (Take the positive direction to be down the incline.)

Diagram:
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/8755/ch11qrotdyn.jpg

Homework Equations



mgsin(theta)
uk*mgcos(theta)
ma
0.5*Kx^2
Solid uniform cylinder moment of inertia = 0.5*MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew free body diagrams for each objects. & derived a equation to solve for acceleration:

m(block)gsin(theta)-ukm(block)gcos(theta)-0.5*kx^2 = 0.5m(pulley)a + m(block)a

But the acceleration that I got was really high, so I believe that it is wrong.

My question is: does the tension of the string between the spring and pulley proportional to the extension of the spring which is 0.5kx^2 ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JennV! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
JennV said:
m(block)gsin(theta)-ukm(block)gcos(theta)-0.5*kx^2 = 0.5m(pulley)a + m(block)a

nooo …

i] the force from the spring is kx, not kx2/2 (that's the PE)

ii] the pulley isn't moving, it's only rotating, so you can't use the mass …

you either need the "effective mass" (if you know how to work that out),

or you need to call the tension either side of the pulley T1 and T2, and do two separate equations, F = ma for the block, and τ =Iα for the pulley …

what do you get? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi JennV! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)


nooo …

i] the force from the spring is kx, not kx2/2 (that's the PE)

ii] the pulley isn't moving, it's only rotating, so you can't use the mass …

you either need the "effective mass" (if you know how to work that out),

or you need to call the tension either side of the pulley T1 and T2, and do two separate equations, F = ma for the block, and τ =Iα for the pulley …

what do you get? :smile:


Thank you so much tiny-tim for replying! But I actually already have derived the answer myself and it was 3.00! YAY! =D
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top