Rotational energy conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy conservation of a pin-ended free-falling rod, focusing on the correct application of kinetic energy formulas. The kinetic energy is expressed as the sum of translational and rotational components, with specific attention to the center of mass and the moment of inertia. A key point is the use of the parallel axis theorem to adjust the moment of inertia when the center of rotation is at the end of the rod. There is confusion regarding the simultaneous use of angular and linear velocities, with a clarification that only one reference point should be used for calculating kinetic energy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistency in the choice of reference points for accurate energy conservation analysis.
dusurme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a little confused about the energy conservation of a pin ended free falling rod.
When i try to derive energy conservation equation i am not sure including angular and linear velocity at the same time. I try to visualize the problem in the attached picture and put my derivation also.
Any explanation will be appretiated.
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the kinetic energy in general:

KE = \frac{1}{2}m v_{cm}^2 + \frac{1}{2}I_{cm}\omega^2


for this example the velocity of the center of mass
v_{cm} = \frac{L}{2}\omega

KE = \frac{1}{2}m \frac{L^2}{4}\omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}I_{cm}\omega^2

Notice if the center of rotation is at the end of the rod, the angular velocity \omega is the same as for the center of rotation being the center of mass.

The moment of inertia changes by the parallel axis theorem
I_0 = I_{cm} + m\left(\frac{L}{2}\right)^2 = I_{cm} + m\frac{L^2}{4}

So we find that the rotational kinetic energy about the end of the rod is equal to the total kinetic energy from before.
\frac{1}{2}I_0\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}\left(I_{cm} + m\frac{L^2}{4}\right)\omega^2 = KE
 
MisterX thanks for the answer.
Could you also suggest me an alternative way of determining angular velocity?
 
dusurme said:
MisterX thanks for the answer.
Could you also suggest me an alternative way of determining angular velocity?
No, he's saying that your solution is incorrect: either you use the kinetic energy of rotation with respect to the centre of mass (and then the moment of inertia is not the one you wrote) *and* the centre of mass' kinetic energy, or the kinetic energy of rotation with respect to the pin, *only* (with the moment of inertia you wrote).
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Back
Top