Rotational Motion of a car on a curve

AI Thread Summary
A 600 kg car navigating a banked curve with a radius of 110m at a speed of 24.5 m/s requires a specific banking angle to maintain its path without friction. The equations governing the motion involve normal force and gravitational force, leading to the relationship tan{theta} = v^2/rg when the second equation is divided by the first. This method simplifies the problem by eliminating common variables, making it easier to isolate theta. Dividing rather than multiplying is preferred for clarity and simplicity in solving for the angle. Understanding the rationale behind this algebraic manipulation is crucial for effectively applying physics principles in rotational motion.
ajmCane22
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 600 kg car is going around a banked curve with a radius of 110m at a speed of 24.5 m/s. What is the appropriate banking angle so that the car stays on its path without the assistance of friction?

Homework Equations



N cos{theta} = mg
N sin{theta} = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I was told to divide the second equation by the first equation which gives tan{theta} = v^2/rg
I used this equation and got the right answer, but I'm just wondering if somebody could please explain WHY the second equation was divided by the first and not the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ajmCane22 said:
I was told to divide the second equation by the first equation which gives tan{theta} = v^2/rg
I used this equation and got the right answer, but I'm just wondering if somebody could please explain WHY the second equation was divided by the first and not the other way around.

If you divided the first equation by the second, you would get:

cot(θ) = (gr/v2)

θ = arccot(gr/v2).

I imagine that ought to give you the right answer as well...
 
This might be a really dumb question, but why do you divide instead of multiply?
 
ajmCane22 said:
This might be a really dumb question, but why do you divide instead of multiply?

You do whatever algebraic manipulation makes it easiest to solve for theta. With N's on both lefthand sides, and m's on both righthand sides, it seems natural to get rid of both of them by dividing them out. Then you're left with something that is only in terms of theta on the lefthand side.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top