MHB Rules for Finding the Base of a Exponential Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the base of exponential functions, with examples provided for clarification. The base of the function f(x)=7^x is correctly identified as 7, while f(x)=3^{2x} has a base of 9 when expressed as (3^2)^x. The function f(x)=8^{\frac{4}{3}x} is analyzed, revealing that it can be rewritten as (8^{\frac{4}{3}})^x, leading to a base of 16 after simplification. However, there is a debate about whether the original base is 8 or 16, as both are discussed in the context of the transformation. Understanding the laws of exponents is crucial for determining the correct bases in these functions.
RidiculousName
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if anyone could point me to a set of rules for finding the base of an exponential function? I can figure out that the base of $$f(x)=7^x$$ is 7 and the base of $$f(x)=3^{2x}$$ is 9 but even though I know $$f(x)=8^{\frac{4}{3}x}$$ has a base of 16, I don't know how that answer was reached.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could write:

$$f(x)=8^{\Large\frac{4}{3}x}=\left(8^{\Large\frac{4}{3}}\right)^x=\left(\left(8^{\Large\frac{1}{3}}\right)^4\right)^x=\left(2^4\right)^x=16^x$$
 
RidiculousName said:
I was wondering if anyone could point me to a set of rules for finding the base of an exponential function? I can figure out that the base of $$f(x)=7^x$$ is 7 and the base of $$f(x)=3^{2x}$$ is 9 but even though I know $$f(x)=8^{\frac{4}{3}x}$$ has a base of 16, I don't know how that answer was reached.
Actually, the base of [math]3^{2x}[/math] is 3! Of course that is the equal to [math](3^2)^x= 9^x[/math] which base 9. [math]f(x)= 8^{\frac{4}{3}ax}[/math] has base 8. Using the "laws of exponents", [math]8^{4/3}= (8^{1/3})^4[/math] and, since [math]2^3= 8[/math], [math]8^{1/3}= 2[/math] so [math]8^{4/3}= 2^4= 16[/math] so that [math]8^{\frac{4}{3}x}= 16^x[/math].

But, again, I would say that the bases have changed. The base in [math]8^{\frac{4}{3}x}[/math] is 8 and the base in [math]16^x[/math] is 16.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top