Schrodinger equation for potential drop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the Schrödinger equation for a particle encountering a finite potential drop. For x<0, the wave function includes both right and left-moving components, while for x>0, the left-moving component is proposed to be zero due to the absence of reflection. However, it is emphasized that continuity of the wave function and its derivative at the boundary (x=0) must be maintained, leading to the conclusion that the left-moving coefficient (Aleft) cannot be zero. The participants agree that proving reflection involves demonstrating that Aleft is non-zero, which can be established through boundary conditions. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the necessity of matching the wave functions at the boundary to confirm the existence of reflection.
cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello! I'm looking at a situation where there is a finite potential Vo for x<0, but zero potential for x>0. For a particle moving from left to right, I'm wondering what coefficients for the solution to the Schrodinger equation are equal to zero, and also how to prove that there is reflection even for a potential drop. hbar is h/(2π).

Homework Equations



Time-independent Schrodinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking:

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]

I think that Bleft is zero, as there is nothing to cause reflection past the potential drop. How can I prove this, and that Aleft is non-zero (ie, potential drop produces reflection)? I know that the wave function and its derivative must be continuous at x=0-- is that sufficient?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, it lost the sub/superscripts. Here are the rewritten equations

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)*(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)*(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]
 
There's nothing to prove. Just state the reason you gave for why Bleft=0. That's enough.
 
... really? I'm skeptical-- the problem asks for a proof.
 
*proof that a potential drop causes reflection, not proof of which coefficient is zero.
 
If you know that B-left is 0 then you know what the form of the equation is on the right side (x>0)

Now its just a boundary condition problem. you need to find A-left and A-right so that the two equations match up at x = 0. Set the two equations equal to each other at x = 0 and also set their derivates to be equal at x = 0. Then its just 2 equations 2 unknowns.

You should find that for the two equations to match up A-left cannot be 0 and there's your proof of reflection
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top