Schrödinger Equation in the classical limit

Erland
Science Advisor
Messages
771
Reaction score
151
I am currently trying to learn a little about quantum mechanics, although not on very detailed level. There is one thing I wonder:

What happens with the Schrödinger Equation in the classical limit, i.e. when either the mass of the particle tends to infinity or when Planck's constant tends to 0?
Somehow, this should be reduced to classical physics, similar to letting c tend to infinity in the Lorentz Transformation leads to the Galilei Transformation. But I cannot see how we get some classical equation from the Schrödinger Equation in a similar case...
 
  • Like
Likes Jano L.
Physics news on Phys.org
Erland said:
I am currently trying to learn a little about quantum mechanics, although not on very detailed level. There is one thing I wonder:

What happens with the Schrödinger Equation in the classical limit, i.e. when either the mass of the particle tends to infinity or when Planck's constant tends to 0?

Big mass does not imply classical object. So the classical limit, as you will see below, concerns only with Planck constant.
Start from the Schrodinger equation (if you know it):
i \hbar \frac{ \partial \Psi ( x , t )}{ \partial t } = H ( \hat{ x } , \hat{ p } ) \Psi ( x , t ) .
Now substitute
\Psi ( x , t ) = R( x , t ) e^{ i S ( x , t ) / \hbar } ,
in the Schrodinger equation, you find
\frac{ i \hbar }{ R } \frac{ \partial R }{ \partial t } = \frac{ \partial S }{ \partial t } + H ( \hat{ x } , \frac{ \partial S }{ \partial \hat{ x } } ) .
So formally, in the limit \hbar \rightarrow 0, you obtain the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation
\frac{ \partial S }{ \partial t } + H ( x , \frac{ \partial S }{ \partial x } ) = 0 .
What really is happening in the classical limit is that, there is a wave packet of width much larger than the de Broglie wave length, in the detailed Scrodinger equation you will have
\frac{ \hbar^{ 2 } }{ 2 m } | \frac{ \nabla^{ 2 } R }{ R } | \ll | \frac{ ( \nabla S )^{ 2 } }{ 2 m } | .
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thanks! I guess I have to look up Hamilton-Jacobi theory.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top