Schrödinger equation: macro level

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Is it possible, in theory, to describe a macroscopic object with the Schrödinger equation (its location for example)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is no "scale" in the SE. The main problem is that you of course also need an relevant Hamiltonian for what you are modeling; preferably one that can be used to solve the problem and for most macroscopic objekt the Hamiltonian is very complicated.

In reality, most people tend to prefer the Heisenberg (or more generally interaction) picture when they model 'simple' macroscopic objects such as superconducting devices for various technical reasons (mainly because it is easier to handle dissipation) but you can always re-write this as a SE

Also, note that solid state qubits are quite large, several square microns (which doesn't sound like much, but you can e.g. easily see them in a decent optical microscope). and they are quite well described by 'simple' SE that can actually be solved.
 
Thanks! In another discussion I'm involved in I stated rather confidently that it is indeed possible, but then it suddenly struck me that my memory might be at fault.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
750
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
143
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
848
Back
Top