Schrödinger's equation and line width

Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
is the spectral linewidth something that is only explained by the uncertainty principle or do you also get this from schrödinger's equation? cause i would say, that schrödinger gives us discrete energy levels if we talk about atoms and therefore there should appear no linewidth.

or do i need to take quantum electrodynamics into account to make proper predictions of spectral lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I vote for the latter explanation: Emission and absorption of photons is described by quantum field theory. In fact it has been invented by Dirac in 1927 to explain precisely this emission and absorption processes.
 
okay, thank you...
 
I disagree, and vote for the first one. While it's true that the emission of photons is ultimately described by QED, this is not necessary to explain the linewidth. The natural linewidth of atomic spectral lines is just one example of a general feature of a decaying stationary state, independent of the interaction that causes it, first elaborated by Weisskopf and Wigner in the context of nuclear physics. If the state has a time dependence e-iEt = e-(Γ/2)t e-iE0t where Γ is related to the lifetime of the state by τ= 1/Γ, the line shape for the emitted radiation is proportional to 1/((E - E0) + Γ2/4). This is known as a Lorentzian or Breit-Wigner form.

QED becomes necessary if you want to calculate Γ itself, or higher order radiative corrections to the line shape.
 
I'd say your both right, because what vanhees71 is saying gives the explanation of why the Gamma that Bill_K is talking about is not zero! But if one is willing to accept its value as given by experiment, then one can proceed to an understanding of linewidth directly from the HUP, or from the (time-dependent) Schroedinger equation that is the source of the HUP. It sounds like Gavroy might be asking essentially "why do transitions happen at all" given the time-independent Schroedinger equation, but we are saying that you have to use the time-dependent Schroedinger equation, either because QED says the Hamiltonian is perturbed, or because experiment tells us there is a decay time there.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top