I Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well

Bullington
Gold Member
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Given the equation ##\frac{d^2 \psi (x)}{{dt}^2}+\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))=0## the general solution is:
$$\psi (x)=A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}$$
If we have an infinite potential well: ## V(x)=\begin{cases} \infty \quad x\ge b\\ 0 \quad a < x < b \\ \infty \quad x \le a \end{cases}## then would that mean I take the limit of x to a and b and both should equal zero? So:

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left(A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}\right)=0+\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)$$ where ## \lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)## diverges. But how could that be zero? Would this mean that ##A_2## must be Zero?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution doesn't have to be the same (that is, the values of ##A_1## and ##A_2## don't have to be the same) in all three regions. Indeed, the potential is different in the different regions so you're looking at different differential equations in the different regions, so you'd expect the solutions to be different. Call the three solutions ##\psi_L(x)## (##x\le{a}##), ##\psi_0(x)## (##a\le{x}\le{b}##) and ##\psi_R(x)## (##x\ge{b}##) and solve for them separately within their own domains. You should be able to convince yourself that ##\psi_L(x)=\psi_R(x)=0## pretty quickly, leaving only ##\psi_0(x)## to work out.

Then apply the boundary condition ##\psi_L(a)=\psi_0(a)## and ##\psi_R(b)=\psi_0(b)##, and you'll be home. You can take ##a=0## without loss of generality and the problem becomes a bit simpler.
 
  • Like
Likes Bullington
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
 
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
For a particle's wavefunction to have a nonzero value at a region where the potential is infinite would suggest that there is a nonzero probability amplitude associated with finding that particle in the region. How can a particle with finite energy exist in a region of space with infinite potential?
 
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
In my intro QM class many years ago, the professor used the method of emphatic assertion to demonstrate the truth of this proposition. :-p

You can get a somewhat more rigorous-looking argument by solving Schrodinger's equation for a finite positive potential, applying the boundary condition that ##\psi(\pm\infty)=0##, and then considering the limit as ##V## approaches infinity. That boundary condition can be justified as requiring that the wave function be a sensible probability distribution, meaning that its squared integral across all space is equal to unity.

However, as a practical matter it is reasonable to look for solutions assuming that an infinite repulsive potential in a region means zero probability of the particle being found in that region, which is equivalent to saying that ##\psi=0## in that region.
 
Don't forget that in general there are both bound states, where ##\psi(x) \rightarrow 0## for ##x \rightarrow \pm \infty## and "scattering states", where the wave function becomes sinusoidal for ##x \rightarrow \infty## and/or ##x \rightarrow -\infty##. A very good treatment of the one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation can be found in Messiah's QM textbook (vol. 1, if I remember right).
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top