Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström metrics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schwarzschild
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the definitions and forms of the Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström metrics, which describe spherically symmetric gravitational fields. The Schwarzschild metric applies to non-rotating, charge-neutral black holes, while the Reissner–Nordström metric extends this to include electric charge. The Reissner–Nordström metric reduces to the Schwarzschild metric when the charge is zero. Additionally, the solid angle is defined in the context of these metrics. The thread emphasizes the mathematical relationships between these two important metrics in general relativity.
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

A non-rotating J = 0 and charge neutral Q = 0 spherically symmetric metric is defined by the Schwarzschild metric:
c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = \left(1 - \frac{r_s}{r} \right) c^2 dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{1 - \frac{r_s}{r}} - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 \right)

The next metric form for a non-rotating J = 0 and charged Q \neq 0 spherically symmetric metric is defined as:
c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = \left( 1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}} \right) c^2 dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}}} - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 \right)

Which reduces directly to the Schwarzschild metric for Q = 0.
Wikipedia said:
In the limit that the charge Q (or equivalently, the length-scale r_Q) goes to zero, one recovers the Schwarzschild metric.

However, the formal definition for a non-rotating J = 0 and charged Q \neq 0 spherically symmetric metric is the Reissner–Nordström metric:
c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = \left( 1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}} \right) c^{2} dt^{2} - \frac{dr^{2}}{1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}}} - r^{2} d\Omega^{2}

Where the solid angle is defined as:
d \Omega^2 = d \theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta d \phi^2

The Reissner–Nordström metric:
\boxed{c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = \left( 1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}} \right) c^2 dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{1 - \frac{r_{s}}{r} + \frac{r_{Q}^{2}}{r^{2}}} - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2 \right)}
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reissner-Nordström_black_hole"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_angle"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
d \Omega^2 = d \theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta d \phi^2
 
It might just be me but... what's the point of this thread?
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top