I Schwinger-Dyson equations derivation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter simonjech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
simonjech
Gold Member
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
This is the part of Schwinger-Dyson equations derivation. I did not understand how can we obtain the commutator in the last line of the picture. I understand why the delta functions appeared from Heaviside functions but there is no minus sign in any term so how can we get the commutator? Anticommutator would make more sence for me.
Screenshot_20230305_212957_Drive.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write down ##\theta (-t)## in terms of ##\theta (t)##. Drawing the graph of ##\theta (-t)## helps.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, simonjech and malawi_glenn
Or just use the chain rule for differentiation
 
I think that i figured it out. The problem was that I did not realized that
Screenshot_20230306_154107_Math Editor.jpg
.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, malawi_glenn, julian and 1 other person
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top