Send Particle Backwards in Time - Is this a hoax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hodges
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Time
hodges
Messages
10
Reaction score
0


Found this on Youtube. Sounds pretty far-fetched to me, but given that it was supposedly broadcast on the Discovery Channel I watched it. The idea is to be able to distort space and time with laser beams, such that a particle can be sent from the future back to the past. Supposedly it is already being actively worked on.

I'm guessing that either 1. the theory itself is invalid, or 2. it would require infinite amounts of energy to actually do this. Any comments from those more knowledgeable on the subject than I am?

Thanks,
Hodges
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
atyy said:
Mallett's Foundations of Physics paper doesn't seem to be on arXiv, but 2 papers commenting on it are:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0410078
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0701024

Thanks for the links. Am I understanding correctly that the first link repudiates what the video describes being attempted? What is the second link? Is it trying to show that the original process using light does not work by arguing that the claimed effects do not even need light?

Hodges
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top