Sentence from Dummit and Foote

  • Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date
In summary, group elements induce the same permutation on a set if and only if they are in the same coset of the kernel, and this also implies a faithful action of the quotient group on the set. The induced action is given by the group element acting on the set element.
  • #1
Bashyboy
1,421
5

Homework Statement



"Two group elements induce the same permutation on ##A## if and only if they are in the same coset of the kernel (if and only if they are in the same fiber of the permutation representation). In particular an action of ##G## on ##A## may also be viewed as a faithful action of ##G/\ker \varphi## on ##A##."

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble parsing the quotation given above, which comes from Dummit and Foote. Letting ##\varphi : G \to S_A## defined by ##\varphi(g) = \sigma_g## denote the permutation representation, does the first sentence in quotation say "If ##g,h \in G##, then ##\sigma_g = \sigma_h## if and only if ##g,h \in x \ker \varphi## for some ##x \in G## if and only if ##g,h \in \varphi^{-1}(\sigma_y)## for some ##\sigma_y \in S_A##"?

As for the second sentence, it seems to say that the group action of ##G## on ##A## induces a faithful action of ##G/\ker \varphi## on ##A##. What exactly is this induced action? The best I could come up with is ##(g \ker \varphi ) \cdot a = g \cdot a##. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes and yes. The elements of the kernel are those who map on the identity permutation of ##A## which means they don't contribute to the action. Simultaneously this destroys uniqueness, resp. a faithful action. Dividing it off solves the problem, which of course has to be shown, because such a quotient doesn't always work, e.g. ##C(G/C(G)) \neq_{i.g.} \{1\}##, i.e. the quotient of a group and its center doesn't necessarily lead to a group with a trivial center.
 

FAQ: Sentence from Dummit and Foote

What is the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote"?

The "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" refers to a specific sentence in the book "Abstract Algebra," written by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote. This sentence is often used as an example or exercise in algebraic proofs and is well-known among mathematicians and students of abstract algebra.

What is the significance of the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote"?

The "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" is significant because it demonstrates the power and versatility of algebraic techniques in solving complex problems. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of clear and rigorous mathematical reasoning.

Can you provide the exact wording of the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote"?

The exact wording of the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" is as follows: "Let G be a group and let H and K be subgroups of G. If H is a normal subgroup of K and K is a normal subgroup of G, then H is a normal subgroup of G."

How do mathematicians use the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" in their work?

Mathematicians use the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" as a tool for proving theorems and solving problems in abstract algebra. It is often used as a starting point for more complex proofs and serves as a foundation for understanding the concept of normal subgroups in group theory.

Are there any variations of the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" used in mathematics?

Yes, there are variations of the "Sentence from Dummit and Foote" that are used in different branches of mathematics, such as commutative algebra and ring theory. These variations involve replacing the term "group" with "ring" and adjusting the statement accordingly. However, the core idea of the sentence remains the same: the normality of subgroups (or subrings) within a larger structure.

Similar threads

3
Replies
93
Views
12K
2
Replies
48
Views
10K
4
Replies
114
Views
8K
2
Replies
40
Views
15K
  • Poll
Replies
4
Views
8K
6
Replies
175
Views
22K
Back
Top