Sequence (a_n)^2 ->0 implies (a_n) ->0 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let an be an infinite sequence.

1) Is it true that an2 ->0 as n->∞
=> an ->0 as n->∞ ?

2) Is it also true that an ->0 as n->∞
=> an2 ->0 as n->∞ ?

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Both SEEM to be true to me, but I am not sure why. What is the simplest way to explain these? I want to understand intuitively.

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Saying that a_n\to 0 means that, given any \epsilon> 0 there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n- 0|= |a_n|< \epsilon.

Saying that a_n^2\to 0 means that, given any \epsilon> 0 there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n^2- 0|= |a_n^2|< \epsilon.

If you know that a_n\to 0 then, given any \epsilon> 0 there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n|< \sqrt{\epsilon}. From that it follows that, for n> N, |a_n^2|< \epsilon.

Conversely, if you know that [itxex]a_n^2\to 0[/itex] then, given any \epsilon> 0, there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n^2|< \epsilon^2. From that it follows that, for n> N, |a_n|< \epsilon.

More generally, if a_n\to a and f(x) is continuous in some neighborhood of a, then f(a_n)\to f(a).
 
HallsofIvy said:
More generally, if a_n\to a and f(x) is continuous in some neighborhood of a, then f(a_n)\to f(a).

Thanks! But I have a question, then.
an2 ->0 as n->∞
=> an ->0 as n->∞

But the square root function is NOT continuous at 0, and it's definitely NOT continuous in a neighbourhood of 0, so the theorem does not apply??
It's weird...
 
Last edited:
Halls said 'more generally'. sqrt is one-sided continuous at 0, from the positive side. If you don't have special theorems about one sided continuity, then just pay attention to his suggestions about an epsilon delta proof. Isn't that what you meant about "SEEM to be true"?
 
I have a question about the proof.

Saying that a_n\to 0 means that, given ANY \epsilon> 0 there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n- 0|= |a_n|< \epsilon.

Because of the word "ANY", we can take epsilon here to be \sqrt{\epsilon}, and there would still exist some N, right?
 
Last edited:
You can if you know as epsilon approaches zero, sqrt(epsilon) approaches zero. If you are ok with that, go for it.
 
Last edited:
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top