B Shape & Dimensions of Containers: Impact on the Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The Maxwell Boltzmann distribution does not change based on the shape of the container, provided that pressure and volume remain constant. The available states for gas particles are considered independent of the container's shape in macroscopic systems. In microscopic systems, the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution is not applicable. Additionally, the distribution does not look the same in two dimensions due to differences in the density of states, necessitating a different normalization factor. Overall, the shape of the container has minimal impact on the distribution in macroscopic scenarios.
sol47739
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I have some basic questions about the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
1.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution change depending on the shape of the container? Pressure and the volume is constant. How is the Distribution affected whether the gas is in: a,sphere b,cube c,cuboid?
Why does/doesn’t the distribution change depending on the shape of the container? 2.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution look the same in 2 dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sol47739 said:
TL;DR Summary: I have some basic questions about the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution

1.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution change depending on the shape of the container? Pressure and the volume is constant. How is the Distribution affected whether the gas is in: a,sphere b,cube c,cuboid?
Why does/doesn’t the distribution change depending on the shape of the container?2.Does the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution look the same in 2 dimensions?
No to both, I would say.

For 2.: The density of states is not the same in 2D so the Normalization factor has to be different.

For 1.: I would think that the available states don't depend on the shape of the container if the container is macroscopic. For a microscopic system the MB-distribution can't be used anyway.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top