Shape of a bubble inside a rotating container

AI Thread Summary
In a rotating closed cylindrical vessel filled with water, an air bubble's shape is influenced by the combination of surface tension and the pressure distribution due to rotation. In weightlessness, the bubble is initially spherical, but rotation introduces additional forces that may alter its shape. The pressure inside the bubble is affected by surface tension, while the water's velocity due to rotation contributes to the overall pressure distribution. The bubble's position remains fixed relative to the cylinder, but its shape may change as the rotation creates artificial gravity effects. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for predicting the bubble's behavior in a rotating fluid environment.
Raihan amin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
1.

A closed cylindrical vessel filled with water (at room temperature) contains a small air bubble of normal pressure and volume ##V=1~{cm}^3## inside in it.The cylinder is then started to be rotated slowly with a small angular acceleration in a complete weightlessness (at a space station) .When the angular velocity of the cylinder has reached to ##w_0=30~s^{-1}##,it is kept constant.
Find the stationary shape of the air bubble.The surface tension of the water is ##\sigma=0.7~ N/m##.
The extra pressure inside a bubble is related to the surface tension is as follows:

$$∆P=\frac{2\sigma}{R}$$.
And for cylindrical symmetry, the pressure inside the container will be
$$P=\frac{1}{2}{\rho}w^2r^2$$

From V we can find ##R_0##.
But i can't figure out how the velocity of water particle will affect the shape of the bubble and what is the advantage of weightlessness?
Thanks.

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The advantage of weightlessness is that you don't have to worry about the direction of the axis of rotation relative to the direction of gravity. Space is isotropic.
Raihan amin said:
But i can't figure out how the velocity of water particle will affect the shape of the bubble ...
In weightlessness, if the cylinder is not rotated, the bubble will be spherical.
Question 1: Will the bubble still be spherical when the cylinder starts rotating in weightlessness? Why or why not?
Question 2: If the bubble is at some arbitrary point (r, θ, z) at the moment the cylinder starts rotating, will it stay there? If yes, what will its subsequent motion be? If no, why not?
 
  • Like
Likes Raihan amin
kuruman said:
Question 2: If the bubble is at some arbitrary point (r, θ, z) at the moment the cylinder starts rotating, will it stay there? If yes, what will its subsequent motion be? If no, why not?
As the cylinder is closed,we can consider it, along with the water,as a rigid body.Then we can say that the bubble will keep it's position fixed.
 
And i have no idea about the shape of the bubble when the cylinder starts rotating. Please give the actual answers of your questions .
 
What would the pressure distribution be inside the rotating container if the bubble were not present?
 
Raihan amin said:
And i have no idea about the shape of the bubble when the cylinder starts rotating. Please give the actual answers of your questions .
This is how it works: You ask a question, we lead you to the answer by asking intermediate questions that you must answer yourself.
Raihan amin said:
As the cylinder is closed,we can consider it, along with the water,as a rigid body.Then we can say that the bubble will keep it's position fixed.
Shouldn't the rotation make a difference? What about artificial gravity?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_gravity
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top