Shouldn't the refracted ray be along the boundary here?

  • B
  • Thread starter Physical_Fire
  • Start date
In summary: In between, you smoothly go from one to the other. In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of total internal reflection, where a light ray is reflected back into a medium rather than being refracted out of it. The diagram shows a glass cube in contact with a liquid, with a light ray directed at a 42° angle of incidence at the vertical face. The angle of refraction is 27°, and total internal reflection occurs for the first time at point P. The critical angle for the glass-liquid boundary is calculated to be 63°. The conversation also addresses a question about the refracted ray going along the boundary and the possibility of total internal reflection occurring at the same angle as the critical angle. It is clarified that
  • #1
Physical_Fire
28
3
A glass cube is held in contact with a liquid and a light ray is directed at a vertical face of the cube. The angle of incidence at the vertical face is 42° and the angle of refraction is 27° as shown in the diagram. The light ray is totally internally reflected for the first time at P. Complete the diagram to show the path of the ray beyond P to the air and calculate the critical angle for the glass-liquid boundary.

Here is the image: .

In the answer scheme, the critical angle is given as 63°. If it is 63°, shouldn't the refracted ray travel along the boundary and not totally internally reflect, as total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle? How is it possible when they are the same angle?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF.

Can we assume that the point P is the same as the point X ?
 
  • #3
Yes, it was a typo from my part; I apologize. I fixed it.
 
  • Like
Likes Baluncore
  • #4
your question is about the refraction of light from the glass to the liquid and for the critical angle you gotta get an angle of incidence that makes the refractive angle 90 so yes they are supposed to go with the boundry
 
  • #5
But in the image, the ray doesn't go along the boundary, and I have trouble visualizing it. How should it be drawn?
 
  • #6
Physical_Fire said:
...as total internal reflection occurs when the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle?
Just make it "greater or equal" if that limiting case confuses you. When you approach it from below, it is when the refraction disappears. When you approach it from above, it is when the refraction appears.

 
Last edited:

FAQ: Shouldn't the refracted ray be along the boundary here?

What is the refracted ray?

The refracted ray is the light ray that changes direction when it passes from one medium to another with a different refractive index. This change in direction occurs due to the change in the speed of light in different media.

Why does the refracted ray not always lie along the boundary?

The refracted ray does not lie along the boundary because Snell's Law governs its direction. According to Snell's Law, the angle of refraction depends on the ratio of the refractive indices of the two media and the angle of incidence. This generally results in the refracted ray bending either towards or away from the normal, not along the boundary.

What is Snell's Law?

Snell's Law is a formula used to describe the relationship between the angles of incidence and refraction, when referring to light or other waves passing through a boundary between two different isotropic media. It is mathematically expressed as n1 * sin(θ1) = n2 * sin(θ2), where n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the two media, and θ1 and θ2 are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively.

Under what conditions can the refracted ray lie along the boundary?

The refracted ray can lie along the boundary in the special case of total internal reflection. This occurs when the light is traveling from a medium with a higher refractive index to a medium with a lower refractive index, and the angle of incidence exceeds the critical angle for the two media. In this case, the light does not enter the second medium but instead reflects entirely within the first medium, traveling along the boundary.

How can we determine the direction of the refracted ray?

To determine the direction of the refracted ray, we use Snell's Law. By knowing the refractive indices of the two media and the angle of incidence, we can calculate the angle of refraction. The direction of the refracted ray is then determined by this angle relative to the normal at the boundary between the two media.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top