Show Taylor Formula Proves E > T_2_E for 0 to c

In summary, the conversation is about using Taylor's formula with a rest term to show that the function E(v) is greater than the second-order Taylor polynomial T_2_E for all values of v in the interval [0,c). The person is uncertain about their expression and the limits of integration, and is struggling to find a valid solution before their deadline.
  • #1
Niles
1,866
0

Homework Statement


I have E(v) = (m*c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

I also have a second-order Taylor-polynomial around v = 0, T_2_E, which is mc^2+½mv^2.

I have to use Taylors formula with restterm to show that E is bigger than T_2_E for all v in the interval [0,c).

The Attempt at a Solution



I have written an expression:

E(v) = T_2_E + 1/n! * int [E'''(t)*(v-t)^2] dt,

where n of course is 2, so it's 1/2 infront of my integral.

I am very uncertain whether my expression is correct or not - do I have to use the limits 0 to c, or 0 to v?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The error will depend upon the specific value of v for which the values are calculated- the integral is from 0 to v.
 
  • #3
I get that E(v) = T_2_E(v) + ½*[E''(t)*(v-t)^2] + [E'(t)*(v-t)] + [E(t)] where the limits are from 0 to v.

From this, I don't see how E(v) >= T_2_E(v)? The "(v-t)"-part will cancel out for t=v?
 
  • #4
I mean, doesn't the restterm become negative?

I mean: 0-E''(0)*v + 0-E'(0)*v + E(v)-E(0)
 
  • #5
Sorry guys, but this paper is due in 5 hours. I've been trying for the past 2-3 hours, but I have no more solutions.

First I thougth of just looking at E'''(t) - so I wouldn't have to integrate. Apparently E''''(t) (4 * ') only has complex roots, so no solutions in R. Then it must mean that E'''(t) (3 * ') is growing, so the integral must be positive or 0.

That just doesn't seem like a valid solution.
 

FAQ: Show Taylor Formula Proves E > T_2_E for 0 to c

What is the Taylor formula and how does it relate to energy?

The Taylor formula is a mathematical formula used to approximate a function using its derivatives. In this context, it can be used to approximate the value of energy as a function of time. The formula is used to prove that the energy, E, is greater than the time derivative of the energy, T_2_E, for values ranging from 0 to the speed of light, c.

Why is it important to show that E > T_2_E for 0 to c?

This inequality is important because it is a fundamental concept in physics. It demonstrates that energy is always increasing over time, and this is a key principle in understanding various physical processes. It also has practical applications, such as in developing more accurate models and simulations.

Can you explain the significance of the range of 0 to c in this formula?

The range of 0 to c is significant because it represents the speed limit of the universe. The speed of light, c, is the maximum speed at which energy can travel. By showing that the inequality holds true for all values within this range, we are providing a universal proof that energy always increases over time.

How is the Taylor formula used in this proof?

The Taylor formula is used to approximate the value of energy at different points in time. By comparing these approximations to the actual value, we can demonstrate that energy is always greater than its time derivative, T_2_E, within the range of 0 to c. This is done using mathematical techniques such as integration and differentiation.

Are there any real-world examples of this inequality in action?

Yes, there are many real-world examples of this inequality. For instance, the decay of radioactive materials is a process that follows this principle, as the amount of energy released increases over time. Another example is the expansion of the universe, which is also a result of the increase in energy over time. This inequality is a fundamental concept in understanding the behavior of energy in various physical systems.

Back
Top