Show Taylor Formula Proves E > T_2_E for 0 to c

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Taylor
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the energy function E(v) exceeds the second-order Taylor polynomial T_2_E for velocities in the range [0, c). The user has derived an expression involving Taylor's formula and is uncertain about the limits of integration, questioning whether they should be from 0 to c or 0 to v. They express confusion about how the remainder term could lead to E(v) being greater than T_2_E, particularly regarding the behavior of the derivatives of E. The user notes that E'''(t) appears to be increasing, suggesting that the integral should yield a positive contribution, but they remain unsure about the validity of their approach. The urgency of the situation is emphasized as they seek clarity before a looming deadline.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have E(v) = (m*c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

I also have a second-order Taylor-polynomial around v = 0, T_2_E, which is mc^2+½mv^2.

I have to use Taylors formula with restterm to show that E is bigger than T_2_E for all v in the interval [0,c).

The Attempt at a Solution



I have written an expression:

E(v) = T_2_E + 1/n! * int [E'''(t)*(v-t)^2] dt,

where n of course is 2, so it's 1/2 infront of my integral.

I am very uncertain whether my expression is correct or not - do I have to use the limits 0 to c, or 0 to v?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The error will depend upon the specific value of v for which the values are calculated- the integral is from 0 to v.
 
I get that E(v) = T_2_E(v) + ½*[E''(t)*(v-t)^2] + [E'(t)*(v-t)] + [E(t)] where the limits are from 0 to v.

From this, I don't see how E(v) >= T_2_E(v)? The "(v-t)"-part will cancel out for t=v?
 
I mean, doesn't the restterm become negative?

I mean: 0-E''(0)*v + 0-E'(0)*v + E(v)-E(0)
 
Sorry guys, but this paper is due in 5 hours. I've been trying for the past 2-3 hours, but I have no more solutions.

First I thougth of just looking at E'''(t) - so I wouldn't have to integrate. Apparently E''''(t) (4 * ') only has complex roots, so no solutions in R. Then it must mean that E'''(t) (3 * ') is growing, so the integral must be positive or 0.

That just doesn't seem like a valid solution.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K