Show that ∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|^2

  • Thread starter Poirot
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dx
In summary, the equation states that the sum of all the terms in a complex Fourier series is the same as the summation of the complex conjugate of each of the terms.
  • #1
Poirot
94
3

Homework Statement


This is a question regarding Fourier series.
∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|2 (note the integral is between -π and π, and the sum is from n= -∞ to ∞)

Homework Equations


Complex Fourier series: f(x) = ∑Cn einx (again between n = -∞ and ∞)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I figured the complex conjugate of the Fourier transform would be:
f*(x)= ∑ C*n e-inx

so |f(x)|2 = ∑ |Cn|2 (as the exponentials cancel)

But I don't understand how the integral comes into things? I think I'm just not overly good at manipulating summations etc, so any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
## |f(x)|^2=f(x) f^*(x)=[\sum_n C_n e^{-inx} ][\sum_m C^*_m e^{imx}]=\sum_n \sum_m C_n C^*_m e^{i(m-n)x} ##
Now integrate the above equation!
 
  • #3
Shyan said:
## |f(x)|^2=f(x) f^*(x)=[\sum_n C_n e^{-inx} ][\sum_m C^*_m e^{imx}]=\sum_n \sum_m C_n C^*_m e^{i(m-n)x} ##
Now integrate the above equation!
Hi there, thanks for the help, I see what I did now, forgot to use another dummy variable for the summation!

I ran through the integral, and found that for the condition where n=m (what we want), wouldn't the exponential go to e0= 1 so the integral between -π and π be 2pi?
 
  • #4
Poirot said:
Hi there, thanks for the help, I see what I did now, forgot to use another dummy variable for the summation!

I ran through the integral, and found that for the condition where n=m (what we want), wouldn't the exponential go to e0= 1 so the integral between -π and π be 2pi?
What you are proving is Parseval's theorem for the discrete case. Depending upon how you define the Fourier transform, (with a factor of 1, or ## 1/\sqrt{2\pi} ##, or ## 1/2\pi ##), you will pick up a different factor on the right side of your equation. When the function f(x) becomes a voltage as a function of time, it basically says that the energy that is found from an integral of V^2 ,(without an R, Power P=V^2/R), over time is the same as that of adding up the energy components in the frequency spectrum.
 
  • #5
Addition to the above (post #4): The ## 1 ##,## 1/\sqrt{2\pi} ##, or ## 1/(2\pi) ## factor is for the continuous case. For the discrete case, there is no such factor, and I think you do need a ## 1/(2\pi) ## factor on the right side of the equation.
 
  • #6
Poirot said:
I ran through the integral, and found that for the condition where n=m (what we want), wouldn't the exponential go to e0= 1 so the integral between -π and π be 2pi?
Its not that you set n=m! All the terms where n and m differ, actually integrate to zero and for the terms where n=m, you get 2π.
 
  • #7
Thanks for all the replies,

But what I am trying to prove is that ∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|^2, which i believe means only the case where m=n matters? And that's where I can't seem to see how to get rid of this extra factor of 2pi? I should also say that a lot of this deep math chat is a little out of my depth.

Thanks again!
 
  • #8
Poirot said:
Thanks for all the replies,

But what I am trying to prove is that ∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|^2, which i believe means only the case where m=n matters? And that's where I can't seem to see how to get rid of this extra factor of 2pi? I should also say that a lot of this deep math chat is a little out of my depth.

Thanks again!

Do you know how to solve the integral ## \int_{-\pi}^\pi e^{i(m-n)x} dx ##? Are you familiar with limits and L'Hôpital's rule?

That 2π depends on how you define the Fourier series. With your definition, its correct to have it. But you can always normalize your Fourier series by defining it with a ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} ## in front of the summation.
 
  • #9
Um, I would integrate how you would normally integrate an exponential giving the same function but over i(m-n), but I suppose that doesn't give the nice answer or 2πδm,n. And as for L'hopital, from what I remember the Lim f/g = f'/g' or something like that.

We usually use the definitions of Fourier transform with 1/root(2π), but I still can't see where that comes in this proof
 
  • #10
Poirot said:
Um, I would integrate how you would normally integrate an exponential giving the same function but over i(m-n), but I suppose that doesn't give the nice answer or 2πδm,n. And as for L'hopital, from what I remember the Lim f/g = f'/g' or something like that.
So you know that the solution to the integral is ## \frac{e^{{\large i(m-n)x}}}{i(m-n)} |_{-\pi}^{\pi} ##. Expand this and see what you can learn about the case where ## n\neq m## and the limit ## m \to n \Rightarrow (m-n)\to 0 \overset{s=m-n}{\Rightarrow} s\to 0##.
Poirot said:
We usually use the definitions of Fourier transform with 1/root(2π), but I still can't see where that comes in this proof
Well...you started with a definition of the Fourier series without ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}##!
 
  • #11
Poirot said:

Homework Statement


This is a question regarding Fourier series.
∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|2 (note the integral is between -π and π, and the sum is from n= -∞ to ∞)

Are you sure the statement is not [tex]
\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} |f(x)|^2\,dx = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty |c_n|^2
[/tex] as appears on the wikipedia page for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parseval's_identity]Parseval's[/PLAIN] identity?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #12
I agree with post #11. My previous statement in post #5 was almost correct. It needs the ## 1/(2\pi) ## on the left side of the equation.
 
  • #13
I'm sure, my lecturer could have made a mistake when writing the question i guess. But yeah thanks anyway guys!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link

FAQ: Show that ∫ dx |f(x)|^2 = ∑ |Cn|^2

What is the significance of the integral on the left side of the equation?

The integral is known as the norm or the squared modulus of the function f(x). It represents the total energy or magnitude of the function over its entire domain.

How is the right side of the equation related to the integral on the left side?

The right side of the equation is a summation of the squared coefficients, Cn, which are derived from the Fourier transform of the function f(x). This shows that the energy or magnitude of the function can also be represented by the sum of the squared coefficients.

Is this equation applicable to all functions?

Yes, this equation is applicable to all functions that are square integrable, meaning that their integral from negative infinity to positive infinity is finite.

Can this equation be used to find the Fourier coefficients of a function?

Yes, by rearranging the equation, we can solve for the Fourier coefficients, Cn, which can then be used to find the Fourier series representation of the function.

What is the practical application of this equation in scientific research?

This equation is commonly used in signal processing, image analysis, and other fields of science and engineering to analyze and manipulate signals and data. It also has applications in quantum mechanics, where the integral represents the probability amplitude of a particle and the squared coefficients represent the probability of observing certain states.

Similar threads

Back
Top