Show that Momentum Operator is Hermitian: Q&A

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the momentum operator is Hermitian. A participant seeks clarification on why the wave function approaches zero at long distances for confined particles and struggles with the final steps of the proof found in an external link. The importance of understanding the definition of Hermitian operators is emphasized, specifically the relationship between an operator and its complex conjugate. Participants suggest reviewing textbook definitions and focusing on inner products to grasp the concept better. Overall, the thread highlights the need for a clear understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics.
krootox217
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hi, my task is to show that the momentum operator is hermitian.

I found a link, which shows how to solve the problem:

http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/notes/MomentumHermitian.pdf

But there are two steps that I don't understand:

1. Why does the wave function approach zero for long distances (for a confined particle)? Can someone explain me this?

2. I don't understand the last step. I got
xMHR6K1.png


And now i don't know how to use the last equation on the paper to show that it is the same.

Can someone help me?

Homework Equations


See above

The Attempt at a Solution


See above[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definition of hermitian?
 
I know what a hermitian matrix is. But here I'm not sure. I guess that the operator is the same as the complex conjugate of the operator?
 
You should start there then. There's no need to guess. The definition should be explained on your textbook or notes. You want to figure out specifically what it means when you say an operator is the same as its complex conjugate. It's probably explained in terms of inner products.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top