Show that the expectation value of angular momentum <Lx> is zero

AI Thread Summary
To show that the expectation value of angular momentum <Lx> is zero, one must utilize ladder operators. The equations L± = Lx ± iLy allow for expressing Lx in terms of L+ and L-. By substituting this expression into the expectation value <Lx> = <l,m|Lx|l,m>, the calculation can proceed. The orthogonality of the |l,m> states plays a crucial role in demonstrating that the resulting expectation value equals zero. Ultimately, the solution hinges on understanding the relationships between the angular momentum operators and their effects on the quantum states.
Jimmy25
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the expectation value of angular momentum <Lx> is zero

Homework Equations



L±|l,m⟩ = SQRT(l(l+1)−m(m±1)h|l,m±1⟩

L± = Lx ± iLy

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm supposed to use ladder operators here to show <Lx> is zero.

I start with <Lx>=<l,m|Lx|l,m> but don't know where to go from here. I've tried different things but all the methods I've tried seem to lead to a dead end...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimmy25 said:

Homework Statement



Show that the expectation value of angular momentum <Lx> is zero

Homework Equations



L±|l,m⟩ = SQRT(l(l+1)−m(m±1)h|l,m±1⟩

L± = Lx ± iLy

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm supposed to use ladder operators here to show <Lx> is zero.

I start with <Lx>=<l,m|Lx|l,m> but don't know where to go from here. I've tried different things but all the methods I've tried seem to lead to a dead end...

Solve your second equation to get L_x in term of L_+ and L_-.

Now, substitute this L_x into \langle L_x \rangle and use the first equation to calculate it.
 
I'm not seeing how that would help. Then I just get an equation in terms of L+, L- and Ly.

Lx=L± minus plus iLy
 
Can anyone help me out here?
 
Use what mathfeel said and think about orthogonality of |l,m> states.
 
You have two equations:
\begin{align*}
\hat{L}_+ &= \hat{L}_x + i\hat{L}_y \\
\hat{L}_- &= \hat{L}_x - i\hat{L}_y
\end{align*}Solve them for Lx in terms of L+ and L-.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top