Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a Gaussian wave packet is an eigenstate of the lowering operator \(\hat{a}\) for a harmonic oscillator. The wave packet is expressed mathematically, and the attempt to show its eigenstate property involves using the definitions of the operators and applying them to the wave function. The calculations reveal that the initial approach does not yield a scalar multiple of the wave function, prompting a correction regarding the treatment of the position operator. Ultimately, the participants identify a cancellation in the calculations that aids in confirming the eigenstate relationship. The discussion concludes with a resolution to the initial confusion regarding the operator's action on the wave packet.
Bapelsin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



For a harmonic oscillator we can define the step up and down operators \hat{a} and \hat{a}^{\dagger} and their action as

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle

\hat{a}^{\dagger}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}-\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle

Show that the Gaussian wave-packet

\Psi(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)}

is an eigenstate to \hat{a} with eigenvalue \alpha.
\hat{a}|a\rangle = \alpha | a\rangle

Express the eigenvalue in terms of x_t and p_t.

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



\hat{p} \rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

gives the expression for

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{\partial}{\partial x})

\hat{a}|\Psi\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}} \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}\left(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)} + \frac{\hbar}{m\omega}(-\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)})\right) = <br /> \Psi\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(1+(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}p_t\right)

which is obviously not a scalar times \Psi.

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the x in the first term in parentheses (which comes from the x operator multiplied by Psi).

Here, cut out the clutter (h is supposed to be hbar in what follows):

C = (mω/h)1/2

A = (h/mω)

Then:

a|Ψ> = C(x + A ∂/∂x)Ψ

= C(xΨ + A∂Ψ/∂x)

= C(xΨ + A[(-mω/h)(x-xt) + (i/h)pt]Ψ)

=C(xΨ + A[-A-1xΨ + A-1xtΨ + (i/h)ptΨ])

See anything that might cancel?
 
Yes. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top