Sig Fig: How Many Magnesium Ions in 200 kg MgO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
Click For Summary
A 200 kg sample of MgO contains 62% magnesium, leading to a calculation of 124 kg of magnesium ions. However, due to significant figure rules, the answer must be reported as 120 kg, which raises concerns about the accuracy of the total mass when combined with the calculated oxygen mass of 76 kg. The total of 196 kg is less than the original 200 kg, prompting questions about the impact of rounding and significant figures on results. The discussion highlights the inherent challenges and limitations of using significant figures in calculations, particularly regarding uncertainties. Rounding issues are acknowledged as a common source of frustration in these calculations.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



A 200. kg sample of MgO is given (Notice 3 sig figs). How many kg of magnesium ions would there be?

Homework Equations



%Mg = 62%
%O = 38%

The Attempt at a Solution



Just a quick question I had about significant figures.

The sample of MgO given is 200.kg (3 sig figs). The percent composition of magnesium is 62% (2 sig figs). Therefore 62% of the 200.kg will be magnesium.

(62%/100%)(200.kg) = (0.62)(200.kg) = 124kg, but because the answer must have 2 sig figs, the final answer would be 120kg ( This is my suspicion ).

Notice if the kg of oxygen is calculated :

(38%/100%)(200.kg) = (0.38)(200.kg) = 76kg. This answer already has 2 sig figs, so nothing needs to be changed.

Now when added together : 120kg + 76kg = 196kg < 200.kg.

Is this result a fault of the rules or a fault of my own?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:
Is this result a fault of the rules or a fault of my own?

Rounding often messes the result in some way. And as significant digits are far from being perfect (generally speaking they are a poor man's way of dealing with uncertainties) there is nothing strange in the fact calculations done using them yield strange results.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Borek said:
Rounding often messes the result in some way. And as significant digits are far from being perfect (generally speaking they are a poor man's way of dealing with uncertainties) there is nothing strange in the fact calculations done using them yield strange results.

Yes, rounding leaves a sour taste every time. Thank you for the confirmation though, I just wanted to make sure.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
50K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K