Sign Issue with Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6

In summary, "Sign Issue with Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6" discusses a specific problem related to sign conventions in the 3.6 version of the Zitelli Quantum Mechanics software. It addresses inconsistencies that arise in calculations due to incorrect sign assignments, leading to potential errors in the interpretation of quantum states and results. The document emphasizes the need for careful examination of these sign conventions to ensure accurate computations and recommendations for users to verify their results against established quantum mechanics principles.
  • #1
katieranthony
5
0
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations
probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p
I will include a photo. Essentially, we need to prove that dp/dt + the gradient of J(x,t) = 0.
We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
katieranthony said:
Homework Statement: A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations: probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p

I will include a photo. Essentially, we need to prove that dp/dt + the gradient of J(x,t) = 0.
We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
 
  • #3
1707977324631.png
 
  • #5
Here is our work. Please let us know if you have any suggestions! We are genuinely very curious.
 

Attachments

  • part2.jpg
    part2.jpg
    78.4 KB · Views: 47
  • part1.jpg
    part1.jpg
    74.6 KB · Views: 39
  • part3.jpg
    part3.jpg
    100 KB · Views: 44
  • #6
katieranthony said:
Here is our work. Please let us know if you have any suggestions! We are genuinely very curious.
Your work in the photo is illegible. It would be best if you used LaTeX. When you do so, maybe you will resolve the negative sign problem. It's probably some silly mistake that you keep repeating because you are convinced that it's correct (it has happened to me too). Start fresh and don't copy from the board.
 
  • #7
katieranthony said:
Homework Statement: A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations: probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p

We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
What two things are equal and opposite?? If ##x_1## and##~x_2## are equal and opposite , don't they sum to zero?? I am confused.
 

FAQ: Sign Issue with Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6

```html

What is the main sign issue in Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6?

The main sign issue in Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6 revolves around the incorrect sign in the Hamiltonian operator used in the Schrödinger equation. This can lead to incorrect predictions of energy levels and wavefunctions.

How does the sign issue affect the results in Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6?

The sign issue can cause significant discrepancies in the calculated physical properties of quantum systems, such as energy spectra and probability densities. This can lead to incorrect interpretations and predictions, potentially invalidating experimental comparisons.

Has the sign issue been officially acknowledged by the authors or publishers?

Yes, the sign issue has been acknowledged by both the authors and the publishers. An erratum has been published to address the mistake, providing the correct form of the Hamiltonian and associated equations.

What steps should be taken to correct the sign issue in Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6?

To correct the sign issue, one should replace the incorrect Hamiltonian operator with the corrected version as specified in the erratum. Additionally, any derived equations and results should be re-evaluated to ensure consistency with the corrected Hamiltonian.

Are there any resources available to help understand the corrections needed for the sign issue?

Yes, there are several resources available, including the official erratum published by the authors, supplementary materials provided by the publishers, and discussion forums where the scientific community has addressed the issue in detail. These resources can help guide the necessary corrections and ensure accurate understanding.

```

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
866
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
616
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top