Simple Derivation Of Diode Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 03myersd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Diode
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the need for a simple derivation of the diode equation for an advanced project. The original poster struggles to find a straightforward explanation and seeks help with the derivation steps, emphasizing the importance of including this analysis in their report due by 3:30 PM. A detailed derivation is provided, incorporating concepts like the continuity equation, built-in voltage, and minority carrier concentration. The final expression for the total current density leads to the standard diode equation. The conversation highlights the complexity of the derivation while expressing urgency for assistance.
03myersd
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am looking for the simplest possible derivation of the diode equation. I need it to reference to it in my advanced higher project. Basically I have to dissect it. I unfortunately don't know how to derive it and I can't find one simple enough to use.

This is what I am trying to end up with:

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0d2e6cbc92.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's possible to get to that equation through a simple derivation. I remember that the continuity equation must be used (in one dimension, for simplicity) and then incorporate boundary conditions and these definitely are not simple. so you might need to reference the whole derivation, though you can skip obvious steps.

Anyway, I got two pages of simple derivation. I can send these later to you as I haven't got a scanner here?

Good luck
 
Last edited:
Well ideally the simplest way possible. Or even just an explanation of the steps. I am so glad that I don't have to understand it at this point. :smile:
 
Please anyone? The report is due in at 3.30 today and I would really like to have the analysis of the derivation included in it. Its not essential but it would essentially round the whole thing off nicely.

Thanks
 
03myersd said:
Please
anyone? The report is due in at 3.30 today and I would really like to
have the analysis of the derivation included in it. Its not essential
but it would essentially round the whole thing off nicely.
Thanks
Here's the derivation; I hope it's not late
{L_p} = diffusion length of holes ({cm})
{D_p} = diffusion constant ({cm^2}/s)
{L_p} = average carrier life time (s)

Firstly, we find \Delta{p}

where \Delta{p} is the minority carrier concentration at the
edge of the depletion region (DP)

we know that the built-in voltage is given by

{V_{bi}} = \frac{kT}{q}\ln({\frac{{N_A}{N_D}}{n_{i^2}}})

Applying the law of mass action {n_{i^2}} =<br /> <br /> {n_{no}}\times{p_{no}}

we get

{V_{bi}} = \frac{kT}{q}\ln({\frac{{n_{no}}{p_{no}}}{n_{i^2}}})

Rearranging

p_{po} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV_{bi}}{kT}) => eqn.1

For non-equilibrium situation, i.e. when there's forward bias voltage

{V_f}

p_{p(0)} = p_{n(0)}\exp(\frac{q(V_{bi}-{V_f})}{kT}) => eqn.2

or
p_{po} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT})

where V = {V_{bi}}-V_f

assuming low injection level, i.e. {p_p}\approx{p_{po}}

eqn.1/eqn.2 by doing this we get \Delta{p}

therefore

\Delta{p} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

Using the continuity equation, we get an expression for the current density

J_{p(x)} = q\frac{D_p}{L_p}\delta_{p(x)}

since \Delta{p} = \delta_{p(x=0)}

so \delta_{p(x=0)}= p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

J_{p(x)} = q\frac{{D_p}{p_{no}}}{L_p}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

Doing the same with electrons, we get a similar expression, hence

J_{total} = J_p + J_n = J_s\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

This is the standard way of expressing the diode equation. However, if we multiply the above expression by the cross-section area, we get the current I.
 
  • Like
Likes navi
August_2007, after the statement "Applying the law of mass action we get ...", the expression for Vbi computes to zero. Since ni^2 = nn0*pn0, then ni^2/(nn0*pn0) must equal 1. So, the ln (1) is zero. So Vbi becomes zero.

Could you clarify? Thanks.

Claude
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top