Simple Quantum Information Question

Pbrunett
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey folks, I have a pretty simple quantum information question that I was hoping somebody could answer.

let's say I have a pure state \ket{\psi} = \alpha \ket{10} + \beta \ket{11} + \gamma \ket{01} + \theta \ket{00}.

I then perform a measurement on only the first qubit and observe a value of 1. How do I now represent the state of my system? The temptation is to just renormalize the coefficients \alpha and \beta, but it's not clear to me whether this is correct or whether I have to use a density operator. Any advice would be awesome, this is a question that popped up while I was reading N and C for self-study. Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good question. I do believe it will be in the renormalized pure state you imagine, as long as the measurement on the first qubit is independent of the second qubit (perhaps the entangled particles are physically separated, for example). The way to think of this is to write the system as a linear combination of the two more obvious cases, the first having in effect \alpha=\theta and \beta=\gamma (so the second qubit is in its own independent pure state before and after the measurement on the first qubit), and the second having in effect \alpha=\beta and \gamma=\theta (so the renormalized result we are talking about is more obviously going to be correct). Rebuilding the combination will yield a pure state, and if you work it out, my money says it will be (\alpha \ket{10} + \beta \ket{11}) / (\alpha + \beta).
 
Remember that measurement is projection and renormalization.

Alright, so |\psi\rangle=a_{00}|00\rangle+a_{01}|01\rangle + a_{10}|10\rangle + a_{11}|11\rangle. A measurement of the first qubit as 1 means that |\psi\rangle should be projected onto the subspace spanned by |10\rangle and |11\rangle. Since |00\rangle and |01\rangle are orthogonal to this subspace, the projected state is simply |\psi\rangle_{\mathit{proj}}=a_{10}|10\rangle + a_{11}|11\rangle, which, however, is not generally a unit vector. So we renormalize in the standard way, and the state after measurement is |\psi_1\rangle= (a_{10}|10\rangle + a_{11}|11\rangle)/||\psi\rangle_{\mathit{proj}}|= (a_{10}|10\rangle + a_{11}|11\rangle)/\sqrt{|a_{10}|^2 + |a_{11}|^2}.
 
Oops, that's how I meant to renormalize it! Still working on the TeX...
 
Awesome, that's what I was hoping for. Thanks for the advice folks!
 
Last edited:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top