MHB Simplify a+b+c+d+2(ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd)+4(abc+abd+acd+bcd)+8(abcd)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlecl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
AI Thread Summary
The expression a+b+c+d+2(ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd)+4(abc+abd+acd+bcd)+8(abcd) cannot be simplified significantly due to the lack of common factors. It is clarified that this is an expression, not an equation. An online computer algebra system suggests a form of simplification as (1/2)(2a+1)(2b+1)(2c+1)(2d+1) - (1/2). This representation may help in understanding the structure of the expression better. Ultimately, the original complexity remains largely intact despite this alternative form.
dlecl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
four variables a,b,c,d
here is the equation: a+b+c+d+2(ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd)+4(abc+abd+acd+bcd)+8(abcd)
wondering if this can be simplified to something much smaller
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dlecl said:
four variables a,b,c,d
here is the equation: a+b+c+d+2(ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd)+4(abc+abd+acd+bcd)+8(abcd)
wondering if this can be simplified to something much smaller

The answer to your question is not really because there is not a common factor in the polynomial.
 
Hey, it's not an equation it's an expression!

Here's what an online CAS thinks.
 
dlecl said:
four variables a,b,c,d
here is the equation: a+b+c+d+2(ab+ac+ad+bc+bd+cd)+4(abc+abd+acd+bcd)+8(abcd)
wondering if this can be simplified to something much smaller
You could write it as $\frac12(2a+1)(2b+1)(2c+1)(2d+1) - \frac12$, if that helps.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top