I Simplifying a nested radical that includes a complex number

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a nested radical involving a complex number, specifically the expression ##\sqrt[3]{\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. The user seeks to understand how to solve a system of polynomial equations derived from equating the real and imaginary parts of the expression, leading to two equations involving variables a and b. Suggestions include substituting c = b/a to reduce the system, although this results in another cubic equation. The user also mentions finding solutions using WolframAlpha, which yields rational solutions, and discusses the general approach to taking cube roots of complex numbers. The conversation highlights the complexity of solving such equations and the potential for rational solutions.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
Simplifying nested radical that has a complex number under it.
Dear Everyone,

This post is not a homework assignment...
I want to use the quartic formula. In one step is to solve the resolvent cubic. I know that there is 3 real solutions this particular resolvent cubic. I want to know how Bombelli got his answers before the discovery of the trigonometric method for the casus irrecidulus.
I have this radical ##\sqrt[3]{\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}}##. I know that if the radicand is a perfect cube, then I can cancel the cube root with the cube. So ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3= \frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. We can equate the Real part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}## and the imagery part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. To yield this system of polynomial equations: $$
\begin{align*}
a^3-9ab^2 &= \frac{24128}{27} \\
3b^3-3a^2b &= \frac{2520}{27} \\
\end{align*}$$

We know that ##a,b\not=0##.I am having a hard time solving this system by hand. Is there any tips on solving a system of polynomials?

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
 
  • Like
Likes cbarker1 and jedishrfu
mfb said:
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
I looked the solution on wolframalpha where I will type the solution form as ##(a,b)##. ##(-\frac{16}{3},\frac{14}{3})##, ##(\frac{29}{3},\frac{1}{3})##, and ##(\frac{-13}{3},-5)##. It has nice solutions...
 
Factoring it actually looks nice, you get ##a(a-3b)(a+3b)## and (after dividing by 3) ##b(b-a)(b+a)##.

I don't really know where to go from there.
 
note: I did this by hand, and I have a sign difference with the wolframalpha solution, but I think the observation is correct
I factored out 2/3 at the beginning giving
##3016c^3+945c^2-3016c-105 = 0##
If you look at the factors of 3016 (f) and -105 (g), you can by guesswork find a solution of the form
##(f_1c-g_1)(f_2c-g_2)(f_3c-g_3)##
which works because there are rational solutions of 7/8, -1/29 and -15/13
 
Last edited:
In general, taking cube roots of complex numbers looks like this:

##(a + bi)^3 = c + di##

With the benefit of hindsight, we can redefine:

##R = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}##
##x = a/R##

##S = \sqrt{c^2 + d^2}##
##y = c/S##

So the problem becomes to find ##R## and ##x## in terms of ##S## and ##y##.

The first part is easy: ##R = S^{1/4}##

Then the equation for ##x## becomes

##(x +i \sqrt{1-x^2})^3 = y +i\sqrt{1-y^2}##

Cubing the left sude and taking just the real part gives:

##x^3 - 3x(1-x^2)= y##
or
##4x^3 -3x = y##

So this reduces the problem to solving a real cubic equation. Not sure that’s an improvement...
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top