Simplifying Equation (14) from Zee's Einstein Gravity for PhD Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter russelljbarry15
  • Start date Start date
russelljbarry15
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am looking for help on page 128 equation (14) from zee's book Einstein Gravity.
A lot of you may not have the book. I have a phd and cannot see it, feel really really stupid.


How did he get rid of the square roots. I know that he used the definition of the derivative from basic calculus without the delta x on the bottom. In the first square root he varied the action so that L moves to the bottom. You need the second g so the taylor series starts off with a derivative.

How does the square root go away when the second part is not varied.

I will use different symbols from the book, but they are only dummy variables so I can change them.
Plus it makes it easier to write out the equation.

∂gκμδX = gκμ(X(λ) + δX(λ)) - gκμ(X(λ))

so you need the second term. Please remember κ and μ are just dummy variables so I am free to choose them, as long as I carry them through. The κ and μ are indices.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah I'm not seeing what he did there either...
 
You expand what's under the first radical, ignoring higher order variations, then you rationalize the expression and you get in the numerator what he has in the parentheses in the last line. The denominator is different not just L, but I suppose it is of the same order.
 
Isn't it just straightforward differentiation? With L = √A he used δ(√A) = (1/√A)(½δA). That puts the L in the denominator. Then with A = a product, A = gμν dXμ/dλ dXν/dλ,

δA = (δgμν) dXμ/dλ dXν/dλ + gμν δdXμ/dλ dXν/dλ + gμν dXμ/dλ δdXν/dλ

= gμν,σ dXσ dXμ/dλ dXν/dλ + gμν dδXμ/dλ dXν/dλ + gμν dXμ/dλ dδXν/dλ
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top