MHB Simplifying exponential expressions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression 8p^-3 x (4p^2)^-2/p^-5. The initial approach involved flipping the negative exponents, leading to an incorrect simplification. It was clarified that the 8 should remain in the numerator since it does not have a negative exponent, which affects the final result. After correcting the steps, the numerical part simplifies to 1/2, leading to the correct answer of 1/2p^2. The importance of accurately handling exponents in simplification is emphasized.
arl2267
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Simplify 8p-3 x (4p2)-2/p-5.

This is what I got:

First thing I did was flip everything to get rid of the negative exponents:

p5/8p3x(4p2)2

next thing I did was multiply the 4p2 by 2

p5/ 8p3x16p4Then I subtracted thep5 from the 8p3

p2/8x16p4

and ended up with

1/128p2 I know that the answer is 1/2p2​ so where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
After expanding the brackets

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times 4^{-2}\times p^{-4}}{p^{-5}}$

$\displaystyle \frac{8p^{-3}\times p^{-4}}{4^{2}\times p^{-5}}$

You can now see the numerical part is $\displaystyle\frac{8}{16}= \frac{1}{2}$
 
In your first step where you "flip" everything, you cannot do this with the 8 since it does not have a negative exponent. If you had left the 8 in the numerator, then you would have gotten the desired result.

edit: Welcome to the forum, and I certainly appreciate the fact that you show your work...this makes it much easier to address where your error(s) may be.:cool:
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top