I Simulating GR: Worth the Effort?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter accdd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
I know that simulation of phenomena in general relativity is computationally complex. However, simulating the phenomena you are studying often helps. In your opinion, should I study methods to simulate what happens in relativity? Is it worth it? Or would it distract me from the theoretical aspects?
I only know the basic programming in python and julia.
I am studying GR from Carroll's book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say, if you are interested in numerical calculations in physics, it's a great time to do this in the field of general relativity right now. This field is "quite hot" at the moment due to the observability of gravitational wave signals from neutron-star mergers. It's also a fascinating, broad topic of (theoretical) physics, involving relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics as well as the equation of state of nuclear matter (high-energy nuclear physics) with close relations to heavy-ion physics as explored at the LHC, RHIC and in the near future close to my home at FAIR.

Here's the website of my astrophysical colleagues, working in this field:

https://relastro.uni-frankfurt.de/
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, PeroK and accdd
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes accdd and vanhees71
vanhees71 said:
Here's the website of my astrophysical colleagues, working in this field:

https://relastro.uni-frankfurt.de/

I love the ITP Calendar for Upcoming Events... :smile:

1654007562016.png
 
When results can’t easily be obtained by pure theoretical or mathematical methods, then (apart from actually building the system or finding the system and taking measurements of it) numerical methods are likely your only way to make progress.

Certainly, a detailed simulation (of any system) has a lot of complexity and may require many resources… but not every simulation has to be that detailed.

Here’s a new book by a colleague that may be helpful:
Numerical Relativity: Starting from Scratch
Baumgarte & Shapiro
https://www.cambridge.org/core/book...rom-scratch/FB5B832C4ED8EFE65A5834C6D6D4657D#

In my opinion, computation is a valuable skill not to be underestimated or undervalued, especially these days.
 
  • Like
Likes accdd and vanhees71
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top