SLAC Electrons: Mass, Velocity & EM Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryWertM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
HarryWertM
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
In the Stanford Linear Accelerator electrons are accelerated thereby gaining mass; velocity; and undoubtedly radiating EM energy. I'm sure they have grounded shielding to avoid loud pops on local AM radio.

But suppose they decelerate electrons the same way - thereby radiating EM energy; losing velocity; and losing mass?? How is energy then conserved?? By creating negative or imaginary mass?? Or do electrons gain even more mass during deceleration, creating "heavy electrons"??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electrons are decelerated against an electric or magnetic force. They exert pressure and force against the magnets to do this. Also, when they radiate energy, that energy has mass. Energy and mass are conserved.
 
So after deceleration, the electrons would have their original "rest mass"?
 
HarryWertM said:
So after deceleration, the electrons would have their original "rest mass"?

That is exactly correct. :biggrin:
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top