Sliding box question- finding applied force with friction

AI Thread Summary
A 90 kg box is pushed up a 28° ramp with a horizontal force at constant speed, requiring calculations for both frictionless and friction-influenced scenarios. The initial calculation for the applied force on a frictionless ramp is 414 N, derived from the gravitational component along the slope. When considering kinetic friction with a coefficient of 0.18, the force of friction is calculated as 141 N, leading to confusion about the resulting applied force. Discussions emphasize that the applied force is horizontal, necessitating decomposition into components to accurately determine the force parallel to the slope. The final consensus suggests reevaluating the calculations to ensure the applied force is not underestimated.
jgray
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 90 kg box is pushed by a horizontal force F at constant speed up a ramp inclined at 28°, as shown. Determine the magnitude of the applied force.
when the ramp is frictionless.
when the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.18.

Homework Equations



Ff= uk(Fn)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have the answer to part 1 complete and correct: I tilted the axis and ended up multiplying sin28degrees(90kg)(9.8m/s^2) to give me 414N for the applied force.
Im not sure about the second part though, where I have friction involved. I tried finding my force of friction --> (0.16)(882N) = 141 N, then subtracting it from my initial applied force I found - so 414N - 141 N gives me 273 N. Not sure if this is correct though.. Help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jgray said:

Homework Statement



A 90 kg box is pushed by a horizontal force F at constant speed up a ramp inclined at 28°, as shown. Determine the magnitude of the applied force.
when the ramp is frictionless.
when the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.18.

Homework Equations



Ff= uk(Fn)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have the answer to part 1 complete and correct: I tilted the axis and ended up multiplying sin28degrees(90kg)(9.8m/s^2) to give me 414N for the applied force.
Keep in mind that the applied force is horizontal. Only a component of that force will be directed along the slope. Draw a free body diagram and see if you can't work out how to decompose the applied force into components along the slope and normal to the slope.

Im not sure about the second part though, where I have friction involved. I tried finding my force of friction --> (0.16)(882N) = 141 N, then subtracting it from my initial applied force I found - so 414N - 141 N gives me 273 N. Not sure if this is correct though.. Help please!

Again, since the applied force is not parallel to the slope, but is horizontal, it's component normal to the slope will contribute to the net normal force that results in friction...
 
jgray said:

Homework Statement



A 90 kg box is pushed by a horizontal force F at constant speed up a ramp inclined at 28°, as shown. Determine the magnitude of the applied force.
when the ramp is frictionless.
when the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.18.

Homework Equations



Ff= uk(Fn)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have the answer to part 1 complete and correct: I tilted the axis and ended up multiplying sin28degrees(90kg)(9.8m/s^2) to give me 414N for the applied force.
No, you are assuming that the applied force is parallel to the incline, when it is given that the applied force is horizontal.
Im not sure about the second part though, where I have friction involved. I tried finding my force of friction --> (0.16)(882N) = 141 N, then subtracting it from my initial applied force I found - so 414N - 141 N gives me 273 N. Not sure if this is correct though.. Help please!
Since the applied force is horizontal, it has a component perpendicular to the incline, which affects the value of the normal force.
But why in any case would the applied force be less than the no friction case? It would be harder to push , wouldn't it?
 
Okay I see what you guys mean about the force being parallel versus horizontal . So instead, I break the Fapplied into x and y components. Since my Fnet of x is 0 d/t no acceleration, my Fgx should be equal and opposite to Fax.. So 414N I think. Then I used cos28Fax to find the applied force, so 370N?
 
jgray said:
Okay I see what you guys mean about the force being parallel versus horizontal . So instead, I break the Fapplied into x and y components. Since my Fnet of x is 0 d/t no acceleration, my Fgx should be equal and opposite to Fax.. So 414N I think. Then I used cos28Fax to find the applied force, so 370N?

You can't get a component of a force that's larger than the force itself (414 is larger than 370) So revisit your calculation of the applied force. If F is the applied horizontal force, what expression yields Fax (its component parallel to the slope)?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top