How is the dot product used to find perpendicular lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qazxsw11111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on using the dot product to determine perpendicular lines in vector mathematics. It clarifies that the dot product of two vectors is zero only when the vectors are perpendicular, not parallel. The confusion arises from the examples in a textbook that utilize the directional vector of a line rather than its equation to find the foot of the perpendicular from a point. Participants emphasize that the dot product is only applicable to vectors, not equations. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly applying the concept of perpendicularity in vector analysis.
qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! So I was looking at vectors and there is this topic which teaches you about using the dot product to find perpendicular lines.

In the sense where AB // CD, AB.CD=0 right?

However, the examples given in the book only uses the directional vector.

E.g. You are given this line l1. Then you need to find the foot of the perpendicular from a point P to l1. So the example use the fact that F (foot of perpendicular) lies on l1 (which l1 vector parametric equation is given) to get the equation of OF and subsequently PF. However, they dot multiplied the PF with the direction vector of l1 and not the equation of l1 which is what I initially thought of.

I know I am misunderstanding something but not sure what it is.

Thank you so much for any clarifications given.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
qazxsw11111 said:
Hi everyone! So I was looking at vectors and there is this topic which teaches you about using the dot product to find perpendicular lines.

In the sense where AB // CD, AB.CD=0 right?
NO! If AB is parallel to CD then AB.CD is equal to the product of the lengths of AB and CD. AB.CD= 0 if AB and CD are perpendicular not parallel.

However, the examples given in the book only uses the directional vector.

E.g. You are given this line l1. Then you need to find the foot of the perpendicular from a point P to l1. So the example use the fact that F (foot of perpendicular) lies on l1 (which l1 vector parametric equation is given) to get the equation of OF and subsequently PF. However, they dot multiplied the PF with the direction vector of l1 and not the equation of l1 which is what I initially thought of.
What do you mean by the dot product of lines anyway?

I know I am misunderstanding something but not sure what it is.

Thank you so much for any clarifications given.
I don't understand what your misunderstanding is! You seem to be complaining that they do not take the dot product of a vector with an equation which would make no sense at all. The dot product is defined only for vectors. Those are the only things you can take the dot product of!
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K