Slight rearrangement of Newton's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Newton's law
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the rearrangement of Newton's Law from F = ma to λxa = F, focusing on its application to linear, one-dimensional objects. The concept replaces mass with linear density times length, raising questions about the uniformity of acceleration across the object. It highlights the relevance of this formulation in analyzing mechanical wave propagation through mediums like springs. The resultant force, Fres, is derived by considering the varying displacements of particles along the spring, complicating the application of Hooke's law. This approach can yield meaningful insights into the behavior of systems under specific conditions.
Timothy S
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Instead of F = ma, is it valid to write λxa = F, (in the case of a linear, one dimensional object). Does this make sense, I am just curious. Also, would this lead to any real insights about a system?

Edit: For clarity's sake, I replaced mass with linear density times length, which in this case is in the x direction.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Depends on how you use it. It can be meaningful.
As an example issue, does every part of your line have the same acceleration?
 
One case for which we use the law in more or less this form is for studying the propagation of mechanical waves through a medium such as a spring. We'd consider a small length, \Delta x, of the spring, and the resultant, Fres, of the slightly different pulls on each 'end'of this piece of the spring, from neighbouring parts of the spring.

Then \lambda \Delta x\ a = Fres

Fres is then found, essentially by applying Hooke's law, but it's quite tricky as Fres arises because the displacements of particles of the spring from their equilibrium position vary as we go along the spring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
946
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K