Smart TV Upgrade: Fire Stick or Fibe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Fire Sticks and similar devices are often discussed in relation to smart TVs and cable services. A smart TV connects to WiFi and can access streaming services like Netflix and Amazon, but these services require subscriptions. For non-smart TVs, devices like Fire Sticks provide streaming capabilities, but the TV must have an HDMI port and a WiFi connection. When it comes to extending cable service to another room, a second cable box from the provider is typically necessary, as third-party devices cannot decode proprietary cable signals. Using a splitter can allow two TVs to display the same program, but it won't enable independent control. Many users express frustration with unreliable cable boxes, prompting interest in alternatives. Purchasing equivalent cable boxes can be a solution to avoid ongoing rental fees, and some users have found success with their own equipment, such as modems, to reduce costs and improve reliability.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,859
Reaction score
7,873
TL;DR Summary
I already have Bell Fibe and a smart Tv in the living room that runs Rogers Cable. I want the bedroom dumb TV to use the same Fibe.
I hear about these Fire Sticks but is that overkill, since I already have Fibe?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I'm not totally clear on what you have and want (partly because I'm unfamiliar with the companies...). Googling Bell Fibe and Rogers Cable; their websites imply each is a cable TV provider. And being a "smart tv" is different from being connected to a cable tv service. The answer may simply to be to contact Bell Fibe and have them send you a receiver box for a second TV if that's the service you're after extending.

A smart Tv is stand-alone, and connects to your WiFi. If the TV itself is dumb, yes, a fire stick, chromecast, Roku, etc. would be how to give it "smarts".

If you want both, the cable box may have smart tv functions too, but I'm not sure.
 
With a smart TV, you can view Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, IMDB, and many other sources of video.

To use something like a Fire Stick, your dumb TV needs an HDMI port like this.
1617281130600.png


It also needs a WiFi connection.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
anorlunda said:
With a smart TV, you can view Netflix, Amazon,
That's a misleading statement. Yes, you can watch them but ONLY if you pay yearly for the subscriptions. Netflix and Amazon [Prime] are not free just because you have a smart TV.
 
phinds said:
That's a misleading statement. Yes, you can watch them but ONLY if you pay yearly for the subscriptions. Netflix and Amazon [Prime] are not free just because you have a smart TV.
I don't think it's misleading at all (I think it is self evident), but I'll generalize: the primary purpose of a smart TV is to connect to/watch streaming media services.

Aside: some such services are "free" and some you have to pay money for.

Aside, aside: I put "'free"' in quotes because nothing is truly free. Even for the "free" ones that you don't pay money for, you are giving them something in exchange for being able to watch.
 
anorlunda said:
With a smart TV, you can view Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, IMDB, and many other sources of video.

To use something like a Fire Stick, your dumb TV needs an HDMI port like this.View attachment 280715

It also needs a WiFi connection.
Really, all I want is to watch regular cable in the bedroom. Currently, the bedroom TV uses a cable box, but Rogers cable boxes are complete crap - they stop working and have to be rebooted regularly.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Really, all I want is to watch regular cable in the bedroom. Currently, the bedroom TV uses a cable box, but Rogers cable boxes are complete crap - they stop working and have to be rebooted regularly.
I don't think there is a way to extend the capability with a 3rd party device; it need its own "tuner" and the ability to communicate with the cable company. The best you could do otherwise would be some sort of splitter that enables watching exactly the same program on both tvs at once.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
russ_watters said:
I don't think there is a way to extend the capability with a 3rd party device; it need its own "tuner" and the ability to communicate with the cable company. The best you could do otherwise would be some sort of splitter that enables watching exactly the same program on both tvs at once.
Right. A cable box will decode the signal specifically for that cable company. They do that so that people can not snoop on their service without paying. You will have to contact the cable company for another cable box or for multiple boxes. Even if you can split the box output, you will not be able to control the box in another room.
 
The crummy cable boxes are the trigger for me wanting to change. These are little boxes, the size of a fat paperback, next to my dumb TV. They are nothing but trouble and heart ache.
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
The crummy cable boxes are the trigger for me wanting to change. These are little boxes, the size of a fat paperback, next to my dumb TV. They are nothing but trouble and heart ache.
Is it possible for you to buy an equivalent cable box? If your cable/ISP is anything like mine, I have a cable box (made by Motorola), for which I pay $10 or so every month forever (grr!), and a wireless modem. At first, I paid a monthly fee for the wireless modem as well, but wised up and bought the same thing for about $80 maybe 5 years ago, thereby eliminating that fee.

We've had the cable provider's cable box for 15 years, and it gives us very little trouble. The wireless modem is a Motorola Surfboard, now a bit long in the tooth, but it works fairly well. Our cable provider is also our ISP, so the modem is used in wireless mode for two laptops, and also by hard-wired ethernet cable for two other computers. Once in a while the wireless side of the modem craps out and I need to power it down for a minute, then everything is fine.
 
Back
Top