MHB So the probability that at least one event occurs is 0.748.

  • Thread starter Thread starter schinb65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that at least one of two independent events occurs, with given probabilities of 0.1 and 0.3. The initial approach uses the formula P(a ∪ b) = P[a] + P[b] - P[a ∩ b], where P[a ∩ b] is determined by multiplying the probabilities of the independent events. An alternative method is presented, calculating the probability of neither event occurring and subtracting that from 1, leading to a final probability of 0.748 when a third event is included. Participants confirm the correctness of both methods, emphasizing that the second approach may be less intuitive initially. The discussion highlights different strategies for solving probability problems involving independent events.
schinb65
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Two independent events have probabilities 0.1 and 0.3. What is the probability that at least one of
the events occurs?


I have an answer of .37, when I looked up the solution it is the same value but it was solved another way. I was just wondering if my logic would work.

Find $P(a \cup b) = P[a] + P - P[a \cap b]$
So I have P[a] and P, and I can find $P[a \cap b]$ from independence I can say that;
$P[a \cap b]$ = P[a]*P, correct?

Or is the only way that I can solve it which is easier then my approach,
1-P[neither event]
1-P(1-a)*P(1-b)
But I do not feel that this would be the first way that would pop into my mind.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: independent event

Hello, schinb65!

Two independent events have probabilities 0.1 and 0.3.
What is the probability that at least one of the events occurs?


I have an answer of 0.37.
When I looked up the solution, it is the same value,
but it was solved another way.
I was just wondering if my logic would work.

Find $P(a \cup b) = P[a] + P - P[a \cap b]$
So I have $P[a]$ and $P$, and I can find $P[a \cap b]$.
From independence I can say that: $P[a \cap b] = P[a]\!\cdot\!P$
Correct? . Yes!

The other approach is:
$1-P[\text{neither event}] \:=\:1 - P(a')\!\cdot\! P(b')$

But I do not feel that this would be the first way
that would pop into my mind.

If there were more events,
. . I'm sure this method would occur to you.Given: .\begin{Bmatrix}P[a] = 0.1 \\ P<b> = 0.3 \\ P[c] = 0.6 \end{Bmatrix}</b>

Find the probability that at least one event occurs.P[a\cup b \cup c] \:=\:1 - P[\sim\!a]\!\cdot\!P[\sim\!b]\!\cdot\!P[\sim\!c]

. . . . . . . . . =\:1 - (0.9)(0.7)(0.4)

. . . . . . . . . =\:1 - 0.252

. . . . . . . . . =\:0.748
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top